Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"John Morrison" <john DOT r DOT morrison AT ntlworld DOT com>
To:	<cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: which which
Date:	Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:58:22 -0000
Message-ID:	<NLEGIGLCGEEOHJGJBGPOMEHPCJAA.john.r.morrison@ntlworld.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To:	<3C332EFD.7161A453@yahoo.com>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance:	Normal

> -----Original Message-----
> [mailto:cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf Of Earnie Boyd
> "Morrison, John" wrote:
> > Personally, I'd rather identify the apps which _arn't_ GNU.  I
> didn't know
> > that the (current) version of which for cygwin wasn't the GNU
> version.  This
> > ment that I kept wondering why it wasn't in 'sync' with the 'latest' GNU
> > one.
> >
>
> Uhm, "Use the source, Luke" (tm).  Alternatively for this particular
> case you could also search the cygwin-announce archive for such hints.
> I know that Corinna said that it was here own version of which when she
> announced it.

:) yeah, I know I could use the source, but at the time I had no interest in
it,
wasn't subscribed to any of the mailing lists and used Cygwin as a complete
(still am to a fair degree) newbie.  I just assumed (yea 'ass U me') that it
was the GNU one.  Maybe all the packages ought to state where they
originated?

J.

- Raw text -