delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Your reference doesn't say that _ALL_ packages need a README. What's difficult with Robots? Your reference also doesn't say anything about adding how the package was configured to a README. Your reference was only dealing with where to put the READMEs that need to be created. I don't see a need for a README for all packages. I don't see a need for a README for Robots. Earnie. Robert Collins wrote: > > The configure flags for the package perhaps. I thought that having > /usr/doc/Cygwin/foo-readme was standard for binary packages - see this > thread (Started by you :]) > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2000-06/msg00021.html > > Rob > === > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Corinna Vinschen" <vinschen AT redhat DOT com> > To: <cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:41 PM > Subject: Re: Robots binary package > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 04:56:19PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > > > Is missing /usr/doc/Cygwin/Robots-2.0.1.README. > > > > > > Is that intentional? > > > > Yes. What do you want to read? > > > > Corinna > > > > -- > > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin > to > > Cygwin Developer > mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > > Red Hat, Inc. > > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |