Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT cygwin DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 5 Dec 2001 08:28:51 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: string.h vs string.h usage
Message-ID:	<20011205132851.GB17608@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3C0E0C4C DOT 73A1750D AT syntrex DOT com> <15915798356 DOT 20011205152138 AT logos-m DOT ru> <3C0E12BA DOT 3843123E AT syntrex DOT com> <17416878469 DOT 20011205153938 AT logos-m DOT ru>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<17416878469.20011205153938@logos-m.ru>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:39:38PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Pavel Tsekov ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com wrote:
>
>PT> egor duda wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi!
>>> 
>>> Wednesday, 05 December, 2001 Pavel Tsekov ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com wrote:
>>> 
>>> SUSv2 mandates both <strings.h> and <string.h>
>>> 
>>> mingw declares strcasecmp() in <string.h> while SUSv2 says it should
>>> be in <strings.h>
>
>PT> Afaik str[n]case is and BSD-ism :)
>
>it doesn't matter as long as standard defines it. please note that it
>doesn't marked as "obsolete" -- usage of those functions is supposedly
>pretty portable.

mingw doesn't have to adhere to this standard!

I can't believe that I've woken up to a huge thread about this trivial
issue.

Can't we just rename strings.h to string.h in setup sources?  What's the
big frigging deal here?

Why does every thread that touches setup.exe have to be so torturous?

cgf

- Raw text -