delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2001 10:48:32 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: unversioned tarballs - do we need to support them (as far as prev/curr/test goes) |
Message-ID: | <20011129154832.GC11595@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <055d01c1788a$bd563cd0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <056d01c1788b$e28922f0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <056d01c1788b$e28922f0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.23.1i |
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:11:12PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >Ignore this, time for a break I think. Actually, I think it is a good question. I have had a versioned byacc tar ball ready to go for a while. I'm not sure why mt doesn't have a version already. Unfortunately, I don't think that we can get rid of the unversioned stuff for a while since people could still have unversioned tar balls sitting around. We could announce it as deprecated, though. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |