delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <03f501c1732c$21f2a570$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <20011122023613 DOT GA8976 AT redhat DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Remove cinstall src directory from snapshots |
Date: | Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:03:11 +1100 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 22 Nov 2001 08:03:05.0551 (UTC) FILETIME=[1D9A95F0:01C1732C] |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> > How should the sources for utils and cinstall be distributed? > > I have just managed to separate winsup/utils as a separate binary > release but I'm not 100% certain how to release the sources. > > winsup/utils is pretty useless without the cygwin directories, I think. > It can probably get by with the installed mingw/w32api, though. > > So, I'm not sure how to release utils. Maybe I need to separate out > the parts of cygwin that get used by utils and put it in a separate > directory. I don't think so, there's no reason that the source for utils isn't cygwin-1.5.3-1-src.tar.bz2. > Wrt to cinstall, I'd like to stop including the sources in snapshots and > net releases. I believe that means that we'll have to release the sources > via some other method to be GPL compliant. Ok, and yes. > I know that Robert has a plan for this but maybe this is as simple as > just including a tar ball next to setup.exe at sources.redhat.com. That sounds fine to me. Or a link to the CVS page and a note there that cinstall is the setup.exe sources. IIRC the GPL doesn't prevent CVS being the distribution method as long as its under the distributors control. Later we can create a setup.exe -src package. Rob
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |