Mail Archives: cygwin-apps/2001/11/15/17:06:37
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 04:57:33PM -0500, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> > From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
> > Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 08:51:47 +1100
> >
> > And what about patching cygwin! to automatically retry on EADDRINUSE -
> > if we can detect that the winsock bug is the culprit? That would fix
> > ssh, squid, telnet, ftp....
>
> As I noted in my message to cygwin-developers, I think this is too
> hard to patch inside Cygwin. The problem is that once the failure
> occurs, the socket is bound to a particular local port and can't be
> rebound to another port, so the socket with the failure is toast.
> This means that you'd have to burn down the socket and reconstruct a
> new one to retry the failed connection, without the caller ever
> noticing. I don't think it's practical to try to do that.
Don't think so. I think we could find a workaround by assigning
local socket numbers in another range (>32768 or so).
Anyway, why of all numbers "4"???
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
- Raw text -