delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Thu, 1 Nov 2001 22:38:21 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: shellutils should be in base? |
Message-ID: | <20011101223821.A7348@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <1004664106 DOT 5225 DOT 13 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <1004664106.5225.13.camel@lifelesswks> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.21i |
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 12:21:45PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >See >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2001-11/msg00055.html. I think it should be in base, yes. >BTW: who maintains shellutils? That would be me, I guess. cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |