delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Date: | Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:05:07 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: get windows error message 0xc0000142 on starting cygwin app |
Message-ID: | <20010919110507.H13403@redhat.com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <20010919095716 DOT B13403 AT redhat DOT com> <000201c1411a$cc3cb410$651c440a AT BRAMSCHE> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <000201c1411a$cc3cb410$651c440a@BRAMSCHE> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.3.21i |
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 04:53:09PM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote: >> No, I mean that an instruction that manipulates the stack results in an >> error. That indicates to me that the stack pointer is screwed up. >> >But that would be code in the ntdll.dll or kernel32.dll ? But as I understand >does this code uses the stack of the current process, that is for example bash >or ssp or gdb, isn't it ? If you don't think it's the stack pointer, you can verify the issue very quickly. Inspect it in gdb. (gdb) info reg $esp (gdb) x/20x $esp >2. objdump shows that ld by default reserves about 2MB for the dll and >exe stack. Isn't this enough ? Who knows? This depends on the application. Have you tried setting the stack size to something larger? You'd probably have to add a -Wl,--stack,4194304 to your gcc linker line. >3. Do you know where I can find informations (online docu) about the >pe format ? I have recognized some differences in the header like a >native win32 app and a ld produced app. For example the "Subsystem" >field differs. Perhaps this is a relocation problem. Do you know any >way to verify this guess ? There must be a lot of documentation in Microsoft's MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |