delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 07:15:26PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >So, while I think that adding cygipc as an "official" package will >detract from other forward progress (the cygwin daemon, etc) and is a >marginally bad thing, my self-interest in giving up maintainership of a >package pushes me to be more positively inclined than I might otherwise be. That's certainly a reasonable position and I have to confess the part of the reason why I feel more positively inclined to include cygipc is because I feel that it has been well maintained over the years. I would have to be convinced that this will continue to be well maintained before I would want to include this by default. It is interesting that I just got back from a cookout and found that one of the messages in the cygwin mailing list was from someone who couldn't get cygipc working. Maybe that's a sign... cgf
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |