| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
> no, this saves execution time rather than calling strlen OVER and OVER
> on the same constant strings. We could compute it once and then cache
> those values, but geez, that's ugly.
Ok, never mind then.
> Is printf ("%s\n", __FUNCTION__); okay ? If so, done.
Yup.
> ret = snprintf (fixup_name, buffer_len, "__fu%d_%s",
> counter++, sym->name);
Sorry, can't use snprintf. Use strlen every time (figure 20 for the
counter) and compare to the max length. Round up to a multiple of 100
to reduce heap fragmentation. Then use regular sprintf.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |