Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:35:11 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: contributing new software
Message-ID:	<20010723143511.C888@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 33 DOT 0107231511160 DOT 19106-100000 AT titanic DOT rtxirl DOT ie> <20010723104537 DOT D1855 AT redhat DOT com> <3B5C57E7 DOT 9090503 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3B5C57E7.9090503@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 12:59:19PM -0400

On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 12:59:19PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 03:15:14PM +0100, Olivier Deme wrote:
>> 
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I have developed an curses-based application which runs on various UNIX-like
>>>operating systems.
>>>I believe that my software could be useful for developers working under Windows,
>>>and for that reason, I have ported the software on Windows using Cygwin.
>>>
>>>I would like to apply for adding my software to the official cygwin contribution
>>>packages.
>>>
>>>How should I proceed to apply the software? Is there a precise procedure to
>>>follow somewhere on the Cygwin web site?
>>>
>> 
>> The first procedure is to read the FAQ and mailing list archives.  Consider it
>> a rite of passage.
>> 
>> We'll also need to be convinced that adding the application to Cygwin is useful.
>> In general, we have only added popular linux/unix packages to the distribution.
>> You didn't provide enough details to determine if your package should be included
>> or not.
>
>There's also the fact that we are currently in a "no-new-packages" 
>freeze until setup.exe-with-dependency/categories lands.

Right.  We can still go through the due diligence, though.

cgf

- Raw text -