delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <010501c11321$d1b7d9a0$562fa4cb@co3007967a> |
From: | "Travis Howell" <kirben AT optushome DOT com DOT au> |
To: | <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <020601c0f27b$d579ea90$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <02a701c11289$bc8b9b90$562fa4cb AT co3007967a> <007e01c112b0$a6de11c0$806410ac AT local> <033a01c112b2$306e53e0$562fa4cb AT co3007967a> <3B5B0686 DOT 5050500 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <009d01c11315$90a94d60$562fa4cb AT co3007967a> <20010722224246 DOT D9168 AT redhat DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: ld --auto-import for cygwin and libtool |
Date: | Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:47:31 +1000 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:19:48AM +1000, Travis Howell wrote: > >I tried using that older binutils 20000722-1 again along with downgrading > >the rest of Cygwin and it still works fine with data exports! > >Are you sure you aren't getting the binutils versions confused ? the > >announcement ( > >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2000/msg00041.html ) for > >20000722-1 mentions nothing much changed but the announcement ( > >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2000/msg00091.html ) for > >20001029 mentions several changes from dj, cgf and you. > > I just checked all of my email. To the best of my knowledge I have > never applied a patch from Paul Sokolovsky to binutils. I could be > wrong but I don't see any mail from him to me about this or from me to > him. > > It's possible that something was broken in binutils by subsequent > changes. > > These days, my binutils releases are fairly standard except for a couple > of my own cygwin-specific changes which were not accepted by the > binutils maintainers. > > cgf A patch from Paul Sokolovsky was in binutils-20001029-2.tar.gz Check out http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2000/msg00091.html and http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2000-11/msg00982.html Quotes from those messages to save you looking: - Fix from Paul Sokolovsky that deals with exporting data variables correctly in conjunction with an --export-all-symbols. 2000-10-04 Paul Sokolovsky <Paul DOT Sokolovsky AT technologist DOT com> * pe-dll.c (make_one): Do not generate code thunk for DATA exports. (process_def_file): deduce DATA flag for auto-export sumbols.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |