delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <022601c0c62b$b79fcb10$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> |
From: | "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au> |
To: | <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> |
Cc: | <newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
References: | <01b301c0c621$063e4ae0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <200104160327 DOT XAA06356 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <01dc01c0c628$23c1f880$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010416000543 DOT B28133 AT redhat DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: next porting question for gcj |
Date: | Mon, 16 Apr 2001 14:14:21 +1000 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 16 Apr 2001 04:07:04.0240 (UTC) FILETIME=[B1ED0300:01C0C62A] |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com> Cc: <newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 2:05 PM Subject: Re: next porting question for gcj > On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 01:48:45PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >I've done some debug tracking and patched gcj to apparently work > >correctly under cygwin. libjava just seems to have some header issues. > > > >Would inserting the __builtin_alloca define be a reasonable workaround? > >(__CYGWIN__ protected of course). > > IMO, newlib's stdlib.h should have something like this in it: > > #ifdef __GNUC__ > # define alloca __builtin_alloca > #endif > > Does this make sense? Or is this a little too generic for newlib? > It may be that some platforms, supported by newlib and gcc, do not > support __builtin_alloca. > > The alternative would be to do something like: > > #if defined(__GNU__) && defined(_USE_BUILTIN_ALLOCA) > # define alloca __builtin_alloca > #endif > > and have features.h: > #define _USE_BUILTIN_ALLOCA > > Comments? > > cgf > As the problem I was reporting occurs when building make bootstrap with gcc 3.0, I don't know if newlib's stdlib affects this. Of course if it doesn, then either of those options make sense to me. Rob
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |