delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
Sender: | cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs> |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <E94FF01DFF6CD31186F4080009DC361501C781BF@nttwr2.tower.bldgs.butlermfg.org> |
From: | "Parker, Ron" <rdparker AT butlermfg DOT com> |
To: | cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Subject: | RE: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge |
Date: | Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:20:45 -0600 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu] <snip> > This whole deal smacks of pure stubborn-ness. "I don't like the > official installation method (even though it was the subject of months > of debate) so I'm gonna muddy the waters with an rpm distro" "Even > though I'm maintaining an rpm of bind for cygwin, I will not > contribute > a binary .tar.gz so that users of the official installation method can > benefit..." I just hope it doesn't degrade into the GNU-emacs vs. XEmacs frackas, where there are actually two very good and very similar packages with one freely using code from the other, but donating none back to the original. (This is not a commentary on XEmacs, I actually use both.)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |