Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:59:23 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc questions prior to -8 release
Message-ID:	<20010228155923.B4675@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010219213847 DOT F23112 AT redhat DOT com> <20010228085315 DOT L449 AT dothill DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<20010228085315.L449@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:53:15AM -0500

On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:53:15AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:38:47PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 2) If we want to stick with -mno-win32 as the default, should gcc
>>    include /usr/include/w32api by default?  I really don't think that
>>    it should but I don't look forward to submitting changes to 
>>    the stuff in sources.redhat.com that breaks as a result.
>
>Have we reached closure on the above?
>
>I can build the current Python CVS with gcc 2.95.2-6 but not 2.95.2-7
>unless I specify -I/usr/include/w32api.  Will the "extra" option be
>needed for 2.95.2-8 and later too?

The majority of people liked the -7 behavior which was to avoid
adding /usr/include/w32api to the search path unless -mwin32 was
specified, so that's what I'll be doing in -8.

cgf

- Raw text -