Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-apps-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender:	cygwin-apps-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-apps-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin-apps AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:02:39 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Texinfo-4.0
Message-ID:	<20001122170239.A11993@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20001122220105 DOT 29631 DOT qmail AT web113 DOT yahoomail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<20001122220105.29631.qmail@web113.yahoomail.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 02:01:05PM -0800

On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 02:01:05PM -0800, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>--- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
>> 
>> Right.  I would welcome a texinfo update but, if anything it should use
>> -mno-win32 as an option to avoid Win32'isms.
>> 
>
>This is the reason I modified my specs file to remove those definitions.  IMHO,
>reversing -mno-win32 to -mwin32 is best.

Unfortunately, I think it is too late for this now.  I think it will cause immense
confusion and breakage if we do this.

cgf

- Raw text -