DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 5B5C9nkU1279488
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 5B5C9nkU1279488
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=XxNIFPQn
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8EDF74C31875
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1764936587;
	bh=oE/CxHywxIPfoKKAcmncO+P4U/AUXxjS7pqFlOHTbvA=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=XxNIFPQnkYFNkcJSOjTWbcu+2X6rkakfkW4UnPKDxu2QHuJRS/gewJXyOw8uzqJ5y
	E2v+kNW5D1VSwQZCjaGXXY4DHWWFjCIKeVa3Dzjp1s4NiWPOkfG734HdABQ4VSagzK
	5m53/XOnSsgFqyQXRnHhtNQfNyP7HO/4i1e3b3k8=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org A25E64C31855
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org A25E64C31855
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1764936564; cv=none;
	b=FzQV56eX5I+/a0SEuqElVUqP0XFLDx/Ag6WP+n3vwxRGgOnKygRBvb7csA3KavBbBM6N0BPSOcYvZqytG+Ui7xDDSLMQ6iwtpgzNgZjg+w0MGrtophMjltiZyp2m4J9dOI+hBIUt5u484p3Dmo+yapnnDZRRryn2c8dg1ScAshE=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1764936564; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=ZhKVyNxwZ6amgbwB/fmZC1mfubGgXWSeNGlTkzaJCHA=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature;
	b=oplb9aRyXKtJHtNhaYp42bkKEhgsu8CYXlrs4KPsW9fwRQBbaegVunhZCP+qQYDmZRDatNPzJKFTHnWUEro2IpQGVrQWhmYP+W16JXK9xRuITrCS1FIw9bkVz+vkXKF4YQa9lUnmbUA34B8LdC7TVa2G1DMMd5jRUmRwc0tjFZQ=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A25E64C31855
Date:	Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:09:19 +0900
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: dynamic conpty loading
Message-Id:	<20251205210919.151847c5c502ec0cb92ce008@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<aTK985UP1pCJVpyr@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<20251121190433 DOT 4a37dc959848a0aea89a8922 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<62f3c1ae-1fd9-477d-a837-d865094dab06 AT towo DOT net>
	<aSCXcoeDbrGOrUTu AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<cc6b613b-1c02-41e3-b045-5b1723b706ab AT towo DOT net>
	<20251126193220 DOT 1b890f58a121add2f0d05fa5 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<3a6ed5bc-24fd-42b0-9f57-83c8eb678a1b AT towo DOT net>
	<20251127172026 DOT 6b6f876fd341f9c0cbd1f876 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20251203175638 DOT 0b4f51242c8fdab685ad9b7e AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<aTFqJo4J6oup4yzH AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<20251205185220 DOT 26512b609b7e96b388245244 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<aTK985UP1pCJVpyr AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 12:11:47 +0100
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec  5 18:52, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 12:01:58 +0100
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > Aren't from here on two patches folded into one?  All but one hunk (the
> > > one calling CreatePseudoConsole_new) seem to be entirely independent of
> > > OpenConsole.
> > 
> > This part is necessary to work with OpenConsle.exe. OpenConsole.exe uses
> > also ESC[c during startup while conhost.exe uses only ESC[6n.
> 
> Ok, but ESC[c is a stock vt100 sequence.  Admittedly, I have no idea if
> there are other terminals out there which use this sequence at startup,
> too...
> 
> > > > -      static const int wpbuf_len = strlen ("\033[32768;32868R");
> > > > +      static const int wpbuf_len = 64; /* for response to CSI6n nad CSIc */
> > > 
> > > Is there some macro for the count of 64 in this context, by any chance?
> > 
> > I'm not sure for now that 64 is really enough for the responce to ESC[c.
> > mintty returns about 30 byte responce. But some other terminal may return
> > longer responce.
> 
> Per the vt100 documentation, the response is supposed to be
> 
>   ESC [ ? 1 ; Ps c
> 
> with Ps being a character in the range 0 - 7.
> 
> Just being curious, what are mintty and OpenConsole returning?

mintty: ESC[?64;1;2;4;6;9;11;15;21;22;28;29c
xterm:  ESC[?64;1;2;3;4;6;9;15;16;17;18;21;22;28;29c
WindowsTerminal: ESC[?61;4;6;7;14;21;22;23;24;28;32;42;52c
conhost.exe:     ESC[?61;1;6;7;21;22;23;24;28;32;42;52c
urxvt:  ESC[?1;2c
putty:  ESC[?6c
TeraTerm: ESC[?1;2c

> > > > [...]
> > > > if [ $(uname -m) = "x86_64" ]
> > > > then
> > > > 	POSTFIX="x64"
> > > > else
> > > > 	POSTFIX="x86"
> > > 
> > > Do we really want a 32 bit version?  Isn't there an aarch64 version?
> > 
> > No.
> 
> Weird.  But Windows on AArch64 supports a x86_64 emulation, iiuc.

Ah, sorry. I meant "No, we do not want 32 bit version."

> > What should we assume result of "uname -m" in aarch64 machine?
> 
> "aarch64" :)

Thanks.

> > > For a start, this may be ok, but we should really try to build our own
> > > OpenConsole package build by our own gcc or clang, IMHO.
> > 
> > OpenConsole.exe also uses WIL, so it looks not easy to build it in cygwin
> > environment.
> > 
> > Maybe just getting it from https://github.com/microsoft/wil/ is enough,
> > but I have not tried it yet.
> 
> Oh, wow!  Looks like fixes to build WIL on MingW have been merged just a
> couple of hours ago.

Thanks!
I'll try to build OpenConsole + WIL under cygwin environment
when I have time.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -