DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 55TGiIQf2393108
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 55TGiIQf2393108
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=QhBqN02g
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E310D3852FE7
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1751215456;
	bh=B65Pl5yEDLB+HO3wCq7tAfDGxuqIIt5oKsQz1Ustnog=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	From:Reply-To:From;
	b=QhBqN02g2m3pvzuhuNCMErncFGzCX5LAMaPVu0yLidPuG2Z3s3fOsy8jmhNTzMxby
	ipo85w2Ut2ZdbMHZiiCqoVvR4MuHoCDF0mFm7h4focsdbQvz7VAMEWHeB9Kt7WV/E7
	8auAgrEiUak+H8RDf5pypmhyPNNZXdJqsep5i6Bo=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 88DE1385E02A
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 88DE1385E02A
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1751215434; cv=none;
	b=fzM5d4qeByognuz2A85rAFbNs5Cxzty4UNTkeZgLOntBRwFENwvzDrrJEJB+er/gJsIzQDBX0klB4XF1GR1AOsP2V75fRRwpCzcZQtHVi3y13QNK9kQB1DexbHPtkR+IIJ97lpBjrG5F89iTp5BJhNhGI/L935GWOtuPkzvatI0=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1751215434; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=shFirRMqLX5Z231jzBsxcrxs0n2RB4TLPznclF66YpY=;
	h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From;
	b=cZzwhbd+sgObPL9eYDoPgE02xKQjF7cuMZeWeycAouALUyRYwVrJaElPxeVbDyndwMRqUDj3UcPaV9bXV9f/Tlvxt/Rf/REt8UQuWLOGKtMomnz2zRL9YbNzyvD1lQKfB7Lsiealm4J0M1Z4dh7nJJkFkG1j/hsy7nrwB2SFfYU=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 88DE1385E02A
X-ASG-Debug-ID:	1751215433-24039d0818c7fb20001-w5GHUG
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From:	moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder:	128.119.240.136
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailsrv.cs.umass.edu 5C17C5BDD5
X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder:	172.26.64.86
Message-ID:	<bb77aee1-5139-57cc-9240-d76d2e1b8e90@cs.umass.edu>
Date:	Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:43:53 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/102.15.1
Subject:	Re: XEmacs as a Cygwin64 package.
X-ASG-Orig-Subj:	Re: XEmacs as a Cygwin64 package.
To:	Aidan Kehoe <kehoea AT parhasard DOT net>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Dan Harkless <dan DOT harkless AT gmail DOT com>
References:	<6861 DOT 633f DOT 55bc7 DOT 1add AT parhasard DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<6861.633f.55bc7.1add@parhasard.net>
X-Barracuda-Connect:	mailsrv.cs.umass.edu[128.119.240.136]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time:	1751215433
X-Barracuda-Encrypted:	TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
X-Barracuda-URL:	https://barramail.cs.umass.edu:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status:	1
X-Virus-Scanned:	by bsmtpd at cs.umass.edu
X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size:	1047
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score:	0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status:	No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0
	QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.7 tests=
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report:	Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.143572
	Rule breakdown below
	pts rule name description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Eliot Moss via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On 6/29/2025 12:01 PM, Aidan Kehoe via Cygwin wrote:
> 
> Dear Cygwin,
> 
> I am the maintainer of XEmacs; I have recently made a beta release and that
> beta release has no complication or exection problems that are specifically
> related to 64-bit Cygwin.
> 
> Dan Harkless advises me that there is no current 64-bit Cygwin XEmacs package
> and that a 32-bit Cygwin XEmacs package remains available. Is there someone
> who might be interested in maintaining a 64-bit Cygwin XEmacs? If not, I am
> happy to take that on.

Dear Aidan - Would you *prefer* to do it yourself, or be at least as happy
if someone else takes it on?

Is there a current maintainer for 32-bit XEmacs?  That person might be
logical to support 64-bit as well.

On a somewhat different tack: Is XEmacs now being more actively developed?
Web commentary from four years ago suggested that its development pretty
much stopped ...  [Note: Certainly not intending to step into the middle
of any contention about Emacs vs XEmacs!]

Regards - Eliot Moss


-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -