delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 532GsHdm2892465 |
Authentication-Results: | delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com |
Authentication-Results: | delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com |
DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 532GsHdm2892465 |
Authentication-Results: | delorie.com; |
dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=fFqYEMp3 | |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7D075384B810 |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; |
s=default; t=1743612855; | |
bh=VeRupTJ8RUUF5O3OpVlIhCYsBsWmyTKQqGW24oDyvak=; | |
h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: | |
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: | |
From; | |
b=fFqYEMp3oENlFktKyyH8svnK3qb7Ru9R1pJBq8lUW53/lgkpusAILyKmiiOx3Y9+3 | |
Ba/kr9jeMzifuqAQ3SMuavZMopw0euGGJQK5UvIfuXbj+PD1r6Khd8XQ/VAOfUCZVI | |
h1RUcU4B5/C8Zl7mVHYgQNQeIxxNuYAk6q67XhXo= | |
X-Original-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org CAF473858D38 |
ARC-Filter: | OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org CAF473858D38 |
ARC-Seal: | i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1743612770; cv=none; |
b=u8PNpaGucaXxY0W+Csq5zvsGy9snT9M3IfYuAM7q/xCumAZ/giLSlPeWuFbvLCz4PhF+DdntUAGPWE4tq/o8pkvTaFhEMHcqZ5MdC2ZB+uM5QQxEbD0oLpGkY0TG9Nj17amD/dN1+t/crJxC5U1lf+gxYNmWAYt/jqREilZNJ50= | |
ARC-Message-Signature: | i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; |
t=1743612770; c=relaxed/simple; | |
bh=idhVGUbwSzUZGq8sWr5DzvZkhAZD0dnrXSnTXb/6zLk=; | |
h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature; | |
b=BBa8Si6DOLtRfincZdqblaYfcm1m9Za9+DlUN7Xnp+RbXJa48QdxjdQW7ztUGvXhmiDXIbJDKhDQsVVpeR493J63aXnXA9+s2gBSGtuVYFOGopzWECEngl0FlGq4/kDVpmhq5BUW/5Ho9AxboBz9MjtXyerY6mOe/2wtCd8oUH4= | |
ARC-Authentication-Results: | i=1; server2.sourceware.org |
Date: | Thu, 3 Apr 2025 01:52:16 +0900 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Crashes in cmake subprocesses since 3.6.0 |
Message-Id: | <20250403015216.3a3d48efb51820b23856225c@nifty.ne.jp> |
In-Reply-To: | <20250402220125.5d2e1d28cfa37ad934a94ed9@nifty.ne.jp> |
References: | <CAE6_+UfTZc0UTb29p=WVXsP7p7sMmOfmd6SOLR8SCPScJEXHRA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<7eaea471-d453-efc7-19cc-58e0ee187af0 AT jdrake DOT com> | |
<Z-pgTDoHXm9ip53T AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> | |
<20250402220125 DOT 5d2e1d28cfa37ad934a94ed9 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> | |
X-Mailer: | Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-BeenThere: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailman-Version: | 2.1.30 |
List-Id: | General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe> | |
List-Archive: | <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help> |
List-Subscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe> | |
From: | Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-To: | Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> |
Errors-To: | cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com |
Sender: | "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 22:01:25 +0900 Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote: > Hi Corinna, > > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 11:28:44 +0200 > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Mar 30 22:58, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025, Christoph Reiter via Cygwin wrote: > > > > > > > Starting with 3.6.0 when cmake calls into make/ninja/gcc there is a chance of > > > > that failing, for example like this: > > > > > > > > CMake Error: Generator: build tool execution failed, command was: > > > > /usr/bin/cmake.exe -E env VERBOSE=1 /usr/bin/make.exe -f Makefile > > > > cmTC_c87e2/fast > > > > > > > > * Problem starts with cygwin 3.6.0 > > > > > > I've also reproduced this with cygwin 3.7.0-0.19.g6c5537c0298e, but it > > > doesn't reproduce as readily as with cygwin 3.6.0-1. > > > > Yes, I can reproduce fails as well, but I don't see an easy way to > > debug this. Your testcase just fails but runs along afterwards. > > > > I'm completely cmake-illiterate, which isn't a great help either. > > > > Two points: > > > > - It's unlikely that this occurs only with 3.6.0-1 and later. It's more > > likely that it occurs on the way from 3.5 to 3.6. Unfortunately the > > remaining 3.6.0 test builds are only going back to patchlevel 429 or > > so. > > > > Any chance one of you could bisect Cygwin and find out which commit > > introduced the problem? > > > > - Also, since this seems to affect certain cmake versions only, can the > > cmake maintainers help here, perhaps? > > Currently, I am looking into this problem. > > What I noticed so far is: > * The problem occurs after the commit 7ed9adb356df. > * This problem is happen when fhandler_fifo_pipe::raw_write() returns > error because cygwait(pipe_mtx, timeout) returns WAIT_FAILED. This seems > to happen due to invalid _cygtls::signal_arrived handle for some reason. > * The following patch solves the issue. > > diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/local_includes/cygtls.h b/winsup/cygwin/local_includes/cygtls.h > index f67e9136c..82a34aeca 100644 > --- a/winsup/cygwin/local_includes/cygtls.h > +++ b/winsup/cygwin/local_includes/cygtls.h > @@ -228,6 +228,9 @@ public: /* Do NOT remove this public: line, it's a marker for gentls_offsets. */ > bool locked (); > HANDLE get_signal_arrived (bool wait_for_lock = true) > { > + DWORD dummy; > + if (signal_arrived && !GetHandleInformation (signal_arrived, &dummy)) > + signal_arrived = NULL; > if (!signal_arrived) > { > if (wait_for_lock) > > Of course, this is not the right thing to do, but this clarifies that the > cause is _cygtis::signal_arrived being invalid even though it is not NULL. > The reason is not quite sure to me. > > Any idea? The following patch also can solve the issue. The problem seems to be related to fork(). Perhaps, the timming of calling _cygtls::fixup_after_fork(), that clears signal_arrived to NULL, might not be appropriate? diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/fork.cc b/winsup/cygwin/fork.cc index 0742ab363..793521314 100644 --- a/winsup/cygwin/fork.cc +++ b/winsup/cygwin/fork.cc @@ -446,10 +446,14 @@ frok::parent (volatile char * volatile stack_here) impure_beg = _impure_ptr; impure_end = _impure_ptr + 1; } + HANDLE signal_arrived_back; + signal_arrived_back = _my_tls.signal_arrived; + _my_tls.signal_arrived = NULL; rc = child_copy (hchild, true, !*with_forkables, "stack", stack_here, ch.stackbase, impure, impure_beg, impure_end, NULL); + _my_tls.signal_arrived = signal_arrived_back; __malloc_unlock (); locked = false; -- Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |