delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 525KqD3x095677 |
Authentication-Results: | delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com |
Authentication-Results: | delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com |
DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 525KqD3x095677 |
Authentication-Results: | delorie.com; |
dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=OjZ6Vc6F | |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 93C593858D26 |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; |
s=default; t=1741207931; | |
bh=l2vshJwG4YTQ/7gWI+2ZIb+oZOb14pvFXPxAreFFLDg=; | |
h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: | |
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: | |
From; | |
b=OjZ6Vc6FTEiQtURHBZMGIRPA4LEeg8dDoedQ1B9n1pZJVZX2prP8HiCZOUAXZIKui | |
qHwLkHSJNNUvHXaTnZ+cHdHLRh0e544y58Qzd/sa/7shtF+ByEi8uUraSpq0VTgIXU | |
L4zQwdZ6mnJgwTDY0P2SnTMTq9kIHOQ7+U4w3cNA= | |
X-Original-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 29AED3858D26 |
ARC-Filter: | OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 29AED3858D26 |
ARC-Seal: | i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1741207868; cv=none; |
b=RYRG3U4Oc5GYpzS7CjB7V1NQy1y5OFnZKQaFGElNKkdwp1guAwucKatr61XYNbpvhcDx7r3YsKKJTqHLMvvVkIBliEkmezccymbSQvrW/DJ8EGlIwdL9nl2t0PdTysEkiBCLz1QYc2/xv9Vi2ZCX4JxfHbaLydHkijieA+yKLbI= | |
ARC-Message-Signature: | i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; |
t=1741207868; c=relaxed/simple; | |
bh=X+GtKQd+bOBNUhRb5PsAbWYuEoQsjx3bmkZC0Wu0ZwE=; | |
h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; | |
b=I3AbgTTpg0LsKDbJDMx+K/y+aOgXtskJXYN00QOkzXLVFfM12kW6Uayd+Fms+UAn5S+hVxm3FZoIW9bMe0WHTNMh9kqrvN5L3UOYRbRAmOmk2CHmrXkv4j4xchigyvbOXVxRMM0twEwBO3RQeRf1RxmzImN7+opXkmWt/awY9vw= | |
ARC-Authentication-Results: | i=1; server2.sourceware.org |
DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 29AED3858D26 |
Date: | Wed, 5 Mar 2025 15:51:02 -0500 |
To: | "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Cygwin 3.6: clang cannot use /usr/include/unistd.h, issue with |
|setproctitle_init()| ... | |
Message-ID: | <Z8i5NuGsW5a4htXO@xps13> |
References: | <CAKAoaQkjCNVRr3wj_2S=FW+-0YLs6SpxN1Fecws83NRR9E0Q3A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<112c2ecc-cfc6-86d4-d7b6-bce46d92197e AT t-online DOT de> | |
<Z8ie5ezqgXKtnmnl AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> | |
<PH0PR09MB1094132B9F45CE4E365E1C802A5CB2 AT PH0PR09MB10941 DOT namprd09 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <PH0PR09MB1094132B9F45CE4E365E1C802A5CB2@PH0PR09MB10941.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> |
X-BeenThere: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailman-Version: | 2.1.30 |
List-Id: | General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe> | |
List-Archive: | <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help> |
List-Subscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe> | |
From: | Glenn Strauss via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-To: | Glenn Strauss <gs-cygwin DOT com AT gluelogic DOT com> |
Errors-To: | cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com |
Sender: | "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 08:27:53PM +0000, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin wrote: > > We could change this to a macro instead: > > > > -static inline void setproctitle_init (int, char *[], char *[]) {} > > +#define setproctitle_init(c, a, e) > > Changing to the empty marco removes the side effects in the arguments (such as len++, for example), > which may silently break existing code -- so I think it's not a good idea. If the idea to use the empty > arguments was not to implicitly document them (because the API was slated for removal, IIRC), then > naming them just with "arg1", "arg2" (rather than leaving empty altogether) should help better, IMO. > > Anton Lavrentiev > Contractor NIH/NLM/NCBI If you want the side effects of the arguments and still want a macro: #define setproctitle_init(c, a, e) \ do { (void)(c); (void)(a); (void)(e); } while (0) or, since it is unlikely (though possible) that someone has defined a single-letter macro for 'c', 'a', or 'b': static inline void setproctitle_init (int c, char *a[], char *b[]) { (void)(c); (void)(a); (void)(e); } or use the intended, more descriptive names in the prototype static inline void setproctitle_init (int argc, char *argv[], char *envp[]) { (void)(argc); (void)(argv); (void)(envp); } If gcc or clang, you could also add __attribute__((__unused__)), though it should probaby be its own macro so that it could be no-op for certain compilers: There is also [[maybe_unused]] https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#maybe-unused-unused https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/error-messages/compiler-warnings/compiler-warning-level-4-c4189?view=msvc-170 #ifndef __attribute_unused__ #ifdef _MSC_VER #define __attribute_unused__ [[maybe_unused]] #else #define __attribute_unused__ __attribute__((__unused__)), #endif #endif static inline void setproctitle_init (int argc __attribute_unused__, char *argv[] __attribute_unused__, char *envp[] __attribute_unused__) { (void)(argc); (void)(argv); (void)(envp); } Cheers, Glenn -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |