DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51K9jJSw200402
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51K9jJSw200402
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=AGedHS+D
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BE9CC3858D20
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1740044718;
	bh=C7CfUhNSFs7HdMo8TlVSmV6LqeBPSG2MEGJF7VEsbio=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=AGedHS+DPcZpZ33wCz1k5yHPswepbkIjqaSztmgRoNtXw4JOWktRxPRA6wyC6ZD2A
	6emn4LyZh0Zn9p3DecT5RYbXpAwj5Hejrgsvr1NcHWHh75+wYraHpwbf7ar14hpv+x
	MbqN2GVaMp5b+J1UDdnxmHwP5r/8m/ilORA8Koko=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DA6D13858D20
Date:	Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:44:48 +0100
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 3.6.0 vs. libbsd 0.11.7-3: -lbsd breaks setproctitle()
Message-ID:	<Z7b5kJPe0JHuJD9H@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4250e737-217a-2b55-c6df-8567b283da15 AT t-online DOT de>
	<Z7XMsdPjKyaOrNIQ AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<e364ba68-bafd-c79e-abbf-d1382e6d3463 AT t-online DOT de>
	<Z7XfUHzBmGikTBqf AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<Z7X6vnVOxIz13Hue AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<Z7ZJSzkfA6AMBjtD AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<2b2f037c-eb06-1edb-bd45-e72e9498af05 AT t-online DOT de>
	<Z7b4Wl_8HYaboYaL AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Z7b4Wl_8HYaboYaL@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 51K9jJSw200402

On Feb 20 10:39, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> On Feb 20 08:34, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > > I uploaded a 0.11.8-1 test package which fixes this issue.  I'll
> > > propagate it to non-test when 3.6.0 is released.
> > 
> > A quick test with stress-ng was successful with both libbsd 0.11.8-1 and
> > 0.12.2-1 test releases:
    ^^^^^^^^

My reading skills... sigh.



> > - Old executable using setproctitle{,_init}() from cygbsd-0.dll still runs.
> > - A rebuild uses setproctitle() from cygwin1.dll.
> > - The testcases using other functions linked to cygbsd-0.dll succeed and
> > setproctitle() now works:
> > 
> > $ procps -C stress-ng -o pid,args --sort pid
> >   PID COMMAND
> > 24706 ./stress-ng --heapsort 1 --mergesort 1 --radixsort 1 --monte-carlo 1
> > --str 1 --wcs 1 -t 30 --verify -v -M
> > 24707 stress-ng-heapsort [run]
> > 24708 stress-ng-mergesort [run]
> > 24709 stress-ng-radixsort [run]
> > 24710 stress-ng-monte-carlo [run]  <= uses arc4random()
> > 24711 stress-ng-str [run] <= uses strlcat/cpy()
> > 24712 stress-ng-wcs [run] <= uses wcslcat/cpy()
> 
> Great, thanks for testing!
> 
> Yesterday I managed to get the latest 0.12.2 version of libbsd running,
> which needs tweaking of the configury.  I uploaded a 0.12.2-1 test
> package late at night.
> 
> However, this morning it occured to me that there are a lot more
> symbols in libbsd, which could be removed as exported symbols, while
> staying available in the DLL itself for backward compat.
> It doesn't make much sense to use the libbsd function for newly built
> applications if the functions are available in the Cygwin DLL anyway,
> right?
> 
> I'll twiddle a bit with this and will come up with a 0.12.2-2 later
> today.
> 
> Can you test the 0.12.2-1 in the meantime?  That would be nice.

So you already did, thank you :}


Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -