DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 4BQ0DLfu147343
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 4BQ0DLfu147343
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=mHVd1aHJ
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 44D833858CDA
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1735172000;
	bh=JhOxZFIaDsSxUr+z29fsGPkmiakIj37sFjCAs7oRUSM=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=mHVd1aHJTcg6D37j/2dL3xI4Iqbv9H2iAui5XWDr3OMsz6ZRTlb8hv9VIEwYZ5eXH
	82Wt6pr8H1c/kroImfOIE4XH8wNtpSFAEop1AIiIRHqivMcdeVFKAzDBe+H7+aFugq
	b7Eha5ItqpbO9qXSJuE5KczxuS1UosUy/JehE8xk=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 16E193858D20
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 16E193858D20
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1735171922; cv=none;
	b=o5qyW4eJ/kRAdOSxMYlX0SazgdMbhRt7b85dB7BRwPw/luSLW6oFEsYjxTKlZsNYrLOkt+1vjGbLStL7HbEm0eGOdQeBhJbqCQzuTU1XU5z+9RKLv3EQ7sgtTLEIDiXYPpH/qTYRhJP4quqI7Mgpqtr8VZepyvdyMQvd9TBagI4=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1735171922; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=ZB5R/gdULkr5q4v/Tv5PM1IqWebqvNq75diw6Sfy8oo=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature;
	b=Od7lGiRTE76xIssMzNVtSte9iJpr92AMMbp4wX0GVRuaoIPZz8qqpCYezvnvH16mjNaz1xQVzJQLwk6ZuXpYyRlGQ95YrLFEkR9cCikD5m1ztfBUimw6xLJ/47q6/zGdyLxUinbrjXabA3WvWYv+4sAIuDQt1RY65jgyGgaEi6U=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 16E193858D20
Date:	Thu, 26 Dec 2024 09:11:58 +0900
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: raise() produces random behaviour in Cygwin 3.5.5
Message-Id:	<20241226091158.0062450b05fd2ba9f46d7f63@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<3393531.CAdn2TfLgq@nimes>
References:	<3393531 DOT CAdn2TfLgq AT nimes>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 07:21:44 +0100
Bruno Haible wrote:
> This unit test is part of Gnulib. Really, it is a pity that none of the
> Cygwin maintainers is running the Gnulib tests before making a new Cygwin
> release.

We once discussed necessity of the test suite for cygwin before.
Do you think the test cases of Gnulib appropriate for the purpose?

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -