DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 498BLTuj4128724
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=T8J+XIvs
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7CC56385DDC1
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1728386487;
	bh=TQWgnuMVxvFr+pEo06FKIfZGxCYPca8jLRtYKhR1OLw=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=T8J+XIvsAssgUGXT6X/SZGuoo8nxtbm+s1Xr4YejCAaNd/2QeeaethTWeqOpAisze
	L79Hrz8+KdjLrCN/hwwcZbxiiX+Ya2+9hpjojP0rUWzXTWVVzIfD+IwunCVBBCH48Q
	mewGO2Nyqmyg8oorQiySRpYSehhaMo9ZAZmuR0EA=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 639863858D29
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 639863858D29
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1728386464; cv=none;
	b=DaYpdzbl3iRcK2wsAOK86a+sJx932XgeyPZaSyDZJvN2Wolz4kYaeM/xSpsaUfa0MqGTG9IjlAyeJqCnR97m9uePDM2Ip1fm/OGXOWe1vgEYxrLq9d6YnFmDPpWhRvy1unHxbge2FWRzjXu/ov5fOayKw5pnzHhAWmO9pUOieyk=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1728386464; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=s13NF2yDeG+VTbzqKpTUCTpFHMXUaHA19A6asnalRCg=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature;
	b=UafOa91JTDJqDSrRqr28/w3CC9t8Lw1XInAHIlyBqf5/e63KWTBM1Z+puoEM1OcFe0SJ39IKHkJd4U2SB3guBzu6djUjefW3s+ngbhUFCBK8JUlsDdApX8a99ZocpiqVzD3A6ZCwrI0/YaToU3KRCLk9Tob4p9Lq8dA7wylqbjA=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:20:57 +0900
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin 3.5.4-1: signal handling destroys 'long double' values
Message-Id:	<20241008202057.abd3dc5bb4df172c530e7655@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<922a6d7e-3ee1-9bb7-dfd7-b94c53a7b9d4@t-online.de>
References:	<922a6d7e-3ee1-9bb7-dfd7-b94c53a7b9d4 AT t-online DOT de>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, BODY_8BITS,
	DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 498BLTuj4128724

On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 15:11:52 +0200
Christian Franke wrote:
> $ gcc -o sigtest -O2 sigtest.c
> 
> $ ./sigtest > out.txt
> (press ^C 42x :-)
> 
> $ sort out.txt | uniq -c
>        3 x = 0x1.23456789p+0, y = -nan, d = -nan
>        6 x = 0x1.23456789p+0, y = 0x1.23456789p+0, d = -nan
>       33 x = 0x1.23456789p+0, y = 0x1.23456789p+0, d = 0x0p+0
> 
> The problem also occurs if compiled without -O2, but less often. No 
> problem occurs if compiled with -DWORKS which suggests that only 'long 
> double' is affected.

Thanks for the report. I looked into this problem and might find the
cause. It seems due to a bug of scripts/gendef. It generates signal
handler caller (sigfe.s) which stores/restores the registers.

In sigdelayed, control word is stored/restored by fnstcw/fldcw instruction,
however, fninit instruction destroys some status registers in FPU (x87).

I think we shold use fnstenv/fldenv rather than fnstcw/fldcw and fninit.
However, I'm not familiar with x87 instructions, so I may overlook
something.

Could anyone expert of x87 instructions and sigfe stuff give some
comments?

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -