DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 45MDo4Od793457
Authentication-Results:	delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=hdnRdry8
X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A9CD1382EF0E
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1719064202;
	bh=qFT8Wf/CJb+OXDhbTqZo+aih+BQvmfFIcbvx3iUy41M=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=hdnRdry899ZbzbdzxDpmIdsgYg9EcgrsTLQgA1VrhVItmTbIcx6vzetGuFofP6UUe
	yPGScGiKMCLDGBWKu1EVdCl20ysTDK8NqaiVCn1TkSGvjzAh6VJLasO1rjpbtGL0EA
	QwEy0v+KpWcD4IT42+110D9FadlmWK7tZFJIeVec=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 93F6C382FAD9
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 93F6C382FAD9
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1719064150; cv=none;
	b=M8ZFmnmjbMQCauZ5RoZjAAm4YOo++vV/nck2D/zWHlXWLqYVIgzq6RyNktQC9bio1KQlqS/njob+lSg6qX5/htaloatOzel6aBsQtDu0pKGKoovZZ2t/7gie4wMTCr4mdbNt8YXr8QJQ2NcPmQidycq/m6s6Q+uwUTvVwciIQXk=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1719064150; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=bnMoJ9XGA83WzJ375wy2WI4p3ojCkzrHO/8aYEhlK74=;
	h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From;
	b=Oy9LGgOgPoJtKEIBkcyljkrbYBASMQXzI9CzwMwLUmQHvvdwiaurgyJK9SPLXJ0peBL06iJqODfaoSAvROUsBZzuIiwjrFj64ZBos5ZwZRb9h+vnLmsxTapUsjt/xXo3Uvfs4rB8h1btjx15KgDOkIQV4wvvHmDdlOCnPE1kQh8=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<3f395d7a-5930-4b63-baca-03f5c6e506c9@kircheis.it>
Date:	Sat, 22 Jun 2024 15:49:01 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Analyze dependencies of a cygwin package
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<07082870-22a4-47a6-8fec-4ef954d181d1 AT kircheis DOT it>
	<ff59d014-94ec-490d-980c-538177daf658 AT maxrnd DOT com>
	<a61a7379-a470-4bb8-9a93-fef3fa25f2c3 AT kircheis DOT it>
	<20240622072242 DOT a4d73ac071285066af58f56a AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20240622092917 DOT 43a848baf5e90159357efcfb AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<d0ba9f25-f116-4c10-913b-beb835de5653 AT kircheis DOT it>
	<20240622171749 DOT 8f5c6212d92f991f3ca9b51f AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
In-Reply-To:	<20240622171749.8f5c6212d92f991f3ca9b51f@nifty.ne.jp>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Federico Kircheis via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Federico Kircheis <federico AT kircheis DOT it>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On 22/06/2024 10.17, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 07:36:19 +0200
> Federico Kircheis wrote:
>> ffmpeg, as far as I've could see, on Debian does not seem to depend
>> transitively on clang.
> 
> ffmpeg on fedora is built with opencl-enabled.
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ffmpeg/blob/rawhide/f/ffmpeg.spec#_702
> 
> I just followed to it. However, cygwin's OpenCL (ocl-icd) suppourts only
> pocl as backend which depends on clang. Therefore, on the second thought,
> enabling opencl for ffmpeg has more disadvantages than advantages.
> 
> I'll release ffmpeg 7.0.1-2 which disables opencl.
> 
>> I was already told once that I probably can leave REQUIRES out.
>>
>> Currently I'm using it for setting up a minimal test environment where I
>> install only the packages listed in REQUIRES.
>> Can cygport give me that information if I do not write any REQUIRES?
>> Last time I asked the answer was no, and thus I decided to keep it to
>> ease testing on my side.
> 
> Without REQUIRES line, "cygport cmus all" with above patch gives me:
> ....
>>>> cmus requires: cygwin libao4 libavcodec61 libavformat61 libavutil59 libcddb2 libcdio18 libcdio_cdda2 libdiscid0 libFLAC12 libiconv2 libmad0 libmodplug1 libmpcdec7 libncursesw10 libopusfile0 libpulse0 libswresample5 libvorbisfile3 libwavpack1
> 
> I guess this is as you expect (if libav* are free from clang dependency),
> isn't it?
> 

Yes, it looks good.

I'll drop the REQUIRES the next time I'll upload a package then.

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -