X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C612C3858D3C
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1708504123;
	bh=i7zKK1EwMGs2z5cZrUVFCt7yO+5VeyteZV2ARaupsbo=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=eMO1es7GXu+rK4jdjDmQBeSiomn5ITp0by5lcc+/lYFsr/hM89v6SCt29KDjFxdI4
	Dyhfrr4A5A0qToWpDLG1BTeOO4kqMDrc6XYNT8CR4JbrDeCMQY8WYoQRgdTcqNMuFD
	ZJFH0Z6M69s4us7oenBNJTgYZANc83320YYi2gxE=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0B67F3858D28
Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2024 09:27:44 +0100
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: binutils >= 2.41 makes .rsrc section read-only
Message-ID:	<ZdW0AIGlzheTdrOA@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<alpine DOT BSO DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2402192133050 DOT 95909 AT resin DOT csoft DOT net>
	<ZdR7tLdneF0Eode_ AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<alpine DOT BSO DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2402202132090 DOT 95909 AT resin DOT csoft DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.BSO.2.21.2402202132090.95909@resin.csoft.net>
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Feb 20 21:39, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> > On Feb 19 21:41, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote:
> > > 1) is there actually a good reason that _cygheap_start is in the .rsrc and
> > > not the .cygheap section?
> >
> > As you know we got rid of this way to define the cygheap, but
> > _cygheap_start was just defined this way so it's the address marking
> > the start address of the cygheap.
> >
> > It was just the way it was.  It's probably just as well to move
> >
> >   _SYM (_cygheap_start) = .;
> >
> > to the begining of the .cygheap section.  Did you try?
> 
> I hadn't; I have now and it seems to work fine.

I'm glad to read that.

> I basically assumed there
> was some reason I wasn't aware of for putting it in the .rsrc section, so
> focused more on trying to figure out how to get binutils to clear the
> readonly section flag.  When I couldn't figure that out, I figured I'd ask
> here both about the "institutional knowledge" if there was a known reason
> why it needed to be in the .rsrc section and because I figured some people
> knowledgable in binutils pe stuff might also read this and be able to give
> me another idea on making the .rsrc section read/write again if it did
> need to stay in that section.

I think there was some historical reason to put in .rsrc, or rather,
into the section preceeding .cygheap, but I don't remember what it was.
Might have had something to do with stripping the cygwin DLL or some
such...


Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -