delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BB241385800D |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; |
s=default; t=1706878574; | |
bh=m7PUB1X3oXADe3JdqshhlWFSLRLB5lYTTobFuGERey0=; | |
h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: | |
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: | |
From; | |
b=oseJk9T689kg3xjKCe6m8LyfmfwNFuiicKZYChKvPmn3+JZ4Y9VJq6nUNwwCIh5Wf | |
VzganqrI+zRXUepf/jA8TSyccABe8qmjkji6mx3b8qdCsTs7hCZT5H8PpCwi6Fvp/7 | |
EHeLBdi6SjliiucD2roDajewjt/R1eSaV15V7bAw= | |
X-Original-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9C3793858403 |
Date: | Fri, 2 Feb 2024 13:55:09 +0100 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Restore SEM_FAILCRITICALERRORS [was: Aren't Windows System Error |
popups meant to be disabled in Cygwin?] | |
Message-ID: | <ZbzmLRByzmDJxUcb@calimero.vinschen.de> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <CAJQQdJiOEduFeAthZ+q+LNXV33aJOhAXqq3sCaxdCqRpAjVmvA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<CAB8Xom-PnumWSLoDFgERXA4GX0zotQiKFvi_wL7Bvsv133WAmw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<CAJQQdJhzSNZ5dG254g5dv_AuWRxt+R-HLdiCPTkCNv=o+4PVeQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<ZbtsBD2IKYtH-duQ AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> | |
<CAJQQdJhS3QgJe_KsfGof_6XM6cwtNRkbPQPR32-JaKCu8_8KEA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <CAJQQdJhS3QgJe_KsfGof_6XM6cwtNRkbPQPR32-JaKCu8_8KEA@mail.gmail.com> |
X-BeenThere: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailman-Version: | 2.1.30 |
List-Id: | General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe> | |
List-Archive: | <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help> |
List-Subscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe> | |
From: | Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Cc: | Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Errors-To: | cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com |
Sender: | "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
On Feb 2 09:43, David Allsopp via Cygwin wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 10:02, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin > <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote: > > > > The behaviour changed in 2020 > > > > https://cygwin.com/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commitdiff;h=21ec498d7f912 > > > > not without a discussion > > > > https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2020q4/010870.html > > Aha, thank you! (congrats on the 3.5 release, in passing, btw). > Definitely not a regression, then (subject edited). > > However, this patch came from MSYS2, and subsequently they seem to > have found it problematic for the same reason as me > (https://github.com/msys2/msys2-runtime/pull/18#issuecomment-810897624) > and have just recently reintroduced the flag > (https://github.com/msys2/msys2-runtime/commit/7616b8a2e0ffcf068b47e1a66bbb1dbd7d9b5c50) > to control it. > > The reasoning in > https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2006-August/150081.html seems as > valid now as it did in 2006. > > Is it possible to revisit having the flag, or even just reverting the behaviour? > > FWIW, it's been "hurting" us over in OCaml-land since zstd support was > added roughly a year ago - configure can tell us that mingw-w64's zstd > is available, but woe betide us if we run the test program to see if > it actually works, but the user forgot to add the sys-root into PATH, > because at that point the CI system is down... I'm sympathetic, and personally I would prefer to revert the patch and stick to SEM_FAILCRITICALERRORS by default. The question is this: Why does, apparently, everybody expect Cygwin to do the "right thing", with different definitions of "right", when in fact the executable in question can easily call SetErrorMode by itself? Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |