X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6D2E93858415
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1706126948;
	bh=CcRGRdYBLugOvsYfNqd1Qk6XITv7wMo2XKeBElYIUsA=;
	h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	From:Reply-To:From;
	b=LgglWYfB8I81yVCk7CYAk8ZY8MQDtCQBdILY7LKqWE+ffgMNwnZsswyN9DHtkWdYY
	kFu1apneN3cMa+nrFxPAEfqnGoeUBtquDfUAqxecMTkXa2flKd+xYGczm9JPra0nNk
	kafv7SH0Xu94pkm7dW8HMdRjdbzf7PuNEv2S/NjU=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org A02243858D28
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org A02243858D28
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1706126927; cv=none;
	b=qudFhBixVJfyFvXXyeL+VKKLCDdLE3jgCcwzdh8voebN2Ulzav0ggdJW5CdBaqev+JN6xdShMFAoqCZKzapsNvo8dAyWhNcbndbbpsB9cJU8X61wYPYwsNqnSV+QQPTyP3PYVyqa5qvKgKlIbYYFMyx8GRxZgeci0FWV7vmUHQ4=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1706126927; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=OTDeO3NEx68d/i2Jy+OWn8l2jEbHh1DnBRNaBHvn7tI=;
	h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID;
	b=cKXMrVHD5NKjmX+KNSC7iRwsQz7l7aWkgqUr5BQTkXkbzC9fUoin1B3GTRS04Ty+6IR7hVHsxWcobatB9/DeNOKJMkNcuD04YuWm7+Ub8EKlkynaQc7XD6HKK//MqZCKXSuEyQ3H4xSiMhZc9skWLihgp2RnlRii0sYgWBlT3PI=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.4 cv=Lo2Bd1Rc c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=65b16e4d
	a=pMSlDXUwMa7SJ1EIez8PdQ==:117 a=pMSlDXUwMa7SJ1EIez8PdQ==:17
	a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=dEuoMetlWLkA:10 a=uZvujYp8AAAA:8 a=lN_5w-FhJtvjiqjs_CYA:9
	a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=BvJ6B6o88AUA:10 a=SLzB8X_8jTLwj6mN0q5r:22
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:08:42 -0800
To:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Possiblly bug of cygwin1.dll
In-Reply-To:	<20240124205514.eaaa7162e3e858cbb39f5801@nifty.ne.jp>
References:	<20240119224436 DOT 876a055f356f7c6796bc725b AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<ZaqHGElhXZIc3NFX AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<20240120131825 DOT 4157c259fe058155137d6fe0 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<c90e29238d7bb99ef6a8787f38585c21 AT kylheku DOT com>
	<20240124205514 DOT eaaa7162e3e858cbb39f5801 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
User-Agent:	Roundcube Webmail/1.4.15
Message-ID:	<69bed0a96ffea6cefae1b95d1c9f67a7@kylheku.com>
X-Sender:	kaz AT kylheku DOT com
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4xfMX7QtNeoc1W15sbK6U2YZOA2/53f4kEIZuxzQE4FrCqAoRuuylaAZu2xtqXPvvY2h70/oJ/BXVALy+6nL0DjKGT0SIhPdjLrdTUQoVfD4QYW9xgc+tT
	oozJMVt20ocLf2tnv24YVWRqNZWy2F8Nz4SpWWy622aN1L5Pg2pff6vn3LjKh3YxZrHHQ1qcBCea0vdiA5jXc4LRNpdFqGHdcAc=
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Kaz Kylheku via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Kaz Kylheku <kaz AT kylheku DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On 2024-01-24 03:55, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> Are there any code examples that use PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER
> with pthread_mutex_destroy()?

I don't think I've seen one.

I think they are rare in the field, precisely because
PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER is mainly used in C code to
"initialize and forget" global mutexes, so they are ready
before the first thread is every created (and before main
is even called).

Nobody cares about destruction of global mutexes in an executable
(not shared library).

>> Use of the initializer is not restricted to static objects
>> by any normative wording.
> 
> It seems that I had read the older POSIX document.
> 
> https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904875/functions/pthread_mutex_destroy.html

Aha! OK!

Because I had a memory of there had been something about a static restriction.

I took it for granted you were right about that, and was looking at that for other reasons.

So, good, that is gone. It never made sense anyway.

Pairing the initializer with the destructor call can be done in all situations now.

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -