X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8B77D38582A3
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1702753651;
	bh=yW9G1aI2NUpePOfImFwcboFOCfjNDJoxMG5miV0PCa4=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:Cc:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=fLDPbKDVTVD8rTc6ELg4bG+DnsFXJqHBUo7ScBj98GNHTIxasGDRVwkeGMw+Z2J1B
	5B6D/2Xo9mBqyPepyGIeKd6qNdIS8UK4vg5fU2hNGHgHhjnfQibqIK6dOi9BrrGs4N
	Tzv/LA9LLi2QHMnqt+DVszoI7y+jPKVPCDvULGkk=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 54FBB3858D28
ARC-Filter:	OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 54FBB3858D28
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1702753615; cv=none;
	b=qnwYrY9kD4iWDE+RQkzQZ6onm21Anqg0Rn9VIbkveeGrtI6+D23gZTRu4iPvpRvZgeSvvHdByp2Tl+6cbZe6gTk0Y3S/jEacjAZa8iUtHoAYM06mLVfoc1C+iJVLqVf+ng8V+FmWoVsPvLYUzdCmqo2p/NqgGjguf69849PpluU=
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1702753615; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=4gN3ob929IWyf/E9NUq32A9RFd3hW5U8wkszHLf0Y04=;
	h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject;
	b=TB0jL2lIABds+87/OrOiLvMOBzPsB9E0g4Lx0X153gujGbPQisHxQ59KcfZdqauZxXNX5bMAxuLCmY53wW8iPwxjdxjfi31YMy2S0ouQPzhY788BDjpANFNgqbIfF8kJhQdj9tkrOwd2+R8dN2zHANrehoIqTdrbI1t3066V62c=
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; server2.sourceware.org
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702753612; x=1703358412;
	h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:subject:message-id:date:from
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
	:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=Cuorz5DsovI00SVTj/G42w2q5n/GgWVRLRYzLGdirTM=;
	b=KTWfanTYxEJ3b+WRtMtfEF0w+u0BLio8goqt+qg3Mn5nZXZ3eHu65D0o363d8o/629
	5VcaOSQVZsAUUz0rZ6PD/6ymVSOZN2sQpQgroYLEXehiHwkYKelqWmtt/vEPJh2XdbZR
	iHhx5kztBpX8FLi+cm7YXzlXGLkP8q1YwPWpZRvl2J/QgCDEiQ+wRmvAfvGkYmwNNmzj
	0ZPWzbgE3ojU+GHfzjSl8hKkup76uYCgbSF1ayic00/DWgdjmD17QH9cDEstWOM2OZdB
	QkAMSSTpx6EXvKFrK01dresuKvTKsbJV5yoQNJGErFH9mc3EOfhQ2EB1tkNU4ueBSzWV
	W3Xg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOJu0Yw/dYfw7dHwlO0nXv/5rd9r/9/0S2RZwWPVI2IGYHF4xzmokWCk
	wwaJTjG3KkPP7AbomxxCEWtMQPBroq7hYRn497itq4G/hvo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AGHT+IGy3k5cdj4o8YjYRKTXa7iPTSpGIb8rp5PmlgtF4s0vUroC0wQLkAg3pVsuGA3ugEWEaMNpUQDlaggMui8dGWM=
X-Received:	by 2002:a17:90a:a50c:b0:28b:2895:9efd with SMTP id
	a12-20020a17090aa50c00b0028b28959efdmr3960494pjq.0.1702753612261; Sat, 16 Dec
	2023 11:06:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<CAKwdsS-eM0APxDhbFNq6SBVKK51hteMgKrwmzm-ZNNEUnaON=A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<910db078-35f2-00f8-0654-59c3c58535e3 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
	<DM8PR09MB7095B74595D43324BE82BFBCA592A AT DM8PR09MB7095 DOT namprd09 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<DM8PR09MB7095B74595D43324BE82BFBCA592A@DM8PR09MB7095.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Dec 2023 11:06:39 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAKwdsS_B4dOLKq5bqAmrxgBTm_BhN58rRJ73DE2jvM2RFF0NJw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: How efficient is 'sleep'?
Cc:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, MALFORMED_FREEMAIL,
	MISSING_HEADERS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Level:	*
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Backwoods BC via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Backwoods BC <completely DOT and DOT totally DOT trash AT gmail DOT com>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 3BGJ7W0B008787

On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 9:37 AM Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
<lavr AT ncbi DOT nlm DOT nih DOT gov> wrote:
>
> > the process isn't allocated any CPU time until the timer expires.
>
> Almost so.  But the "sleep" functions are interruptible, so if a process (the "sleep" command)
> is somehow signaled, it will wake up prematurely, and will have to either put itself back to
> sleep (for the remaining unslept time) or terminate, whatever the implementation is.  So in the
> former case, there is some CPU still consumed (and that would depend on how often the signal
> arrives), and in the former case, the actual slept time can be quite inaccurate (from what you
> think it should have been).
>
> Signaling with scripts can be quite tricky as the signal can propagate to the entire process
> group, rather than a single process (depending on which process the signal was sent to).
>
> Using cron (as others suggested) gives you a time accuracy up to a second (give or take), but
> then again it depends on the load of the system, and may drift rather significantly.
>
> My $.02,
>
> Anton Lavrentiev
> Contractor NIH/NLM/NCBI

Thank you for the answers. This is a personal computer and nothing my
"services" do cares much about the actual time between runs so the
uncertainty using 'sleep' isn't an issue. Back in the XP days, I used
a Windows version of 'cron' to run things, but it stopped working and
I just modified the small number of scripts it launched to time
themselves.

I was just curious as to how much of a penalty I was paying for my
laziness and you've confirmed that the answer is "not much." My
computer has been slowing down and I was looking for the culprit,
which is most likely just increasing software bloat (wheezy voice: "In
my day, 4 kB was a huge program:)

My current computer is not "Win 11 ready" and I'm not replacing
perfectly functional hardware, so I will be migrating to a Linux
desktop in 2025 (or sooner) and will have 'cron' available again.

Again, thanks for the answers.

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -