X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4831C3858402
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1694173038;
	bh=hwEfQWosEG1+GVak/WZy2XntRMMxBre/6nvi9yzCUQQ=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=aLS7GjyEzx1S8iAETTkbyBeiIq45+aOQKtoWIlWb37N2fSi8EnZj8iBHDJwGmtnPZ
	nmEr+j2UFnTLvUnXee7lQazVT59NhtgPxW0foxRarkKONkdgtFk0sT2uQIzzYqjPua
	ttzXpDqkOpDRAVaGn0ZzadD3cOtGgkyeggiufgz0=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E787B3858D1E
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694173020; x=1694777820;
	h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=S9oF7F3XUcU9PTPmG82xWVt7yEjx+/W0C5o500n1f1A=;
	b=D94Wf3A+8VyYg/9U7U3KRLGUfuoNSZYop+asnXqpNd9tp84j6TywmXI6zA41y1nJA7
	t7G2mZgZhUuobdvBS2gaZRAG8xUcckrmsA+yA0Z5Zh6cw5+ZeOKXrbM4LRDwvouacVd/
	ui0NSgQRuuWfBAaqlcS8hCfktThmlnwTqaACndeN/Y5JXa7ZV48xp7gx/wqND7Xxsjdk
	Gjr4iRMvi614mQ5FYspgcFgftdHLs46JhgQ823Q9ZYNk1H5R/pKKggVAGuRtD6ccyc0+
	1RyF6xiAI44giC7pdqo4rWEzo1Vo7dEaSqj+50EMhPfDj5g/jt+adccc7l3Xh72OBpRf
	kUOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOJu0YwRqgolPqu7sFjPeNtRs6cSkzAIhAeYSOJEgBaTuvBN84doOShp
	IwiUC1KRAzZQ7+oVsA+Ysp7HkAw1x9TXtrlgewSIqH3c
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AGHT+IGbUuKTaCE464i1MxLkWLRHNIUL9yc6eC8eWMGe6U0o6hnaVvSULNmGFhAoQKSDU/hU6a5zdYv1/SGbBNL6ERk=
X-Received:	by 2002:a25:dac7:0:b0:d7b:8f3c:d7f6 with SMTP id
	n190-20020a25dac7000000b00d7b8f3cd7f6mr2077972ybf.43.1694173020176; Fri, 08
	Sep 2023 04:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<CANnL4pMrcdfZheDO7_-sR92CtGH5jJVuw=sAJeAtummjhFGqKQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<ZPr8KB/MpdMOe2IL AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<ZPr8KB/MpdMOe2IL@calimero.vinschen.de>
Date:	Fri, 8 Sep 2023 07:36:48 -0400
Message-ID:	<CANnL4pMk-Y_0hS+z_VzK_Egf4hk2seztJA_b=24iYxf0t=jj2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: ARG_MAX missing from getconf
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Matthew mirage335 Hines <spamfreemirage335 AT gmail DOT com>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,
	FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-Content-Filtered-By:	Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.30
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.30
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	"Matthew \"mirage335\" Hines via Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	"Matthew \"mirage335\" Hines" <spamfreemirage335 AT gmail DOT com>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 388BbJhW001167

Ok, I guess that makes sense.

My worry was some './configure' script determining that the build
environment is somehow not 'sane'. At least for the limited set of programs
that I use under cygwin, I have set up my CI to now watch for changes in
which binaries are present. Nothing obviously significant in that history
so far.

At this point, from comparing with my previous CI results, I am guessing
this doesn't affect me, aside from adding an exception to my test case for
this specifically. Might be better to get closer to the usual Linux
behavior I am familiar with, of a much higher, valid, ARG_MAX value.

On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:49 AM Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
wrote:

> On Sep  8 00:14, Matthew "mirage335" Hines via Cygwin wrote:
> > Really hope other Cygwin packages will not be broken because 'ARG_MAX' is
> > now undefined in 'getconf' output. Caught this in a CI test for a rather
> > large shell script.
> >
> >
> https://github.com/mirage335-colossus/ubiquitous_bash/blob/master/structure/installation.sh#L385
>
> Please read this, this is supposed to explain the new ARG_MAX
> behaviour sufficiently:
>
> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2023-August/254352.html
>
>
> Corinna
>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -