delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2023/06/24/04:31:28

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 66AA93858031
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
s=default; t=1687595449;
bh=F1ebCbaHiUNGqbQO/PC8B/DtUHFSabw4kA1yW1Zx2Pc=;
h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
From;
b=jnw9vHGzOdjmSF3yAszmtigkNrrm59fdcHLQvMtqFp0FHn/rP7nZHO5FuKMn8PsG1
HZNe6zph0lBRmM5T9e9CGEjqXqZR1p6tuCaO1RAMHNoZ+G7A3XmdgoKwCyMCLyThzQ
AaUfCq9wXrKHL2V/zWfQcNUJm0kqyPNz6oaOUqAA=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BE59D3858414
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687595393; x=1690187393;
h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from
:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=D8j+me2Ml+4Qt40jOMKrBdvT3ZTxs5tgfyCOhyTEmgk=;
b=UiG6/fyc1IBEqDfgKfcFJ+nXA84ogD5xjQap9d64o1/1Kark3YsV57eOH78KaFzI6d
95qNHFT4+FPOhB83XFtYuboguK3nD5s9nuHm8Wcsk3hBu6c7vIY+F1OqXxnKFcmCwVH3
nswZgPyKvssJ5/bT3iTO9GWlTSL2kG/sYF+nYdToyGGw0MOS6Cp6aXRQ3Yibmd+Newua
HXzqOSCihd4JabiZLJ9btipk59F7wywGYY3VI5j75zKdvKkH1BafxD9XeZdKJAw5ylkQ
PGRqz9oJCGZVUdfH5+m2OzHU5gVtjMGx9PdsLKyX2tTB/+ILY5Q3GTxptEuBHV+zzDmG
WzAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDze7qmcBBZQfYgxkh5wJkVub9eBp/z8YDYDgsATCrYuLaqthRYv
zZJLpgzKg5YXYYox47vASQFf7g6b92An1r1NqEGRgukdyWV4U09D
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4zTUZrV0gwcLfH+iRFOdroIglWFOCAfHKMIeGjbHdCw/DLqkksbp18dTkoowoY3Q1MHg7tZ6TC8lVe+vl6x2w=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1584:b0:3a1:a191:d454 with SMTP id
t4-20020a056808158400b003a1a191d454mr6063502oiw.29.1687595393080; Sat, 24 Jun
2023 01:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <afc7d261-6116-7f4b-9642-0533d1fdde92 AT Shaw DOT ca>
<87pm6lvwoh DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
In-Reply-To: <87pm6lvwoh.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 09:30:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJQQdJjUarc1hkZCVX-GWD=Cq7XF4bnWE+ArzLxrUqWWpC7=rg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cygwin test 3.5.0 tar symlinks error messages and failure status
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: David Allsopp via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: David Allsopp <david AT tarides DOT com>
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 35O8VCho022854

Achim Gratz wrote:
> Brian Inglis writes:
> > Problem writing tar (with Cygwin default sys) symlinks before target
> > created under Cygwin 3.5.0 - error messages are issued and tar exits
> > with failure status!
> […]
> > The only likely culprit between 3.4.6 and that commit seems to be
> > commit 2023-04-18 fa84aa4dd2fb43eaf7fcdfb040aef854f2f19d01 Cygwin: fix
> > errno values set by readlinkat.
> >
> > Still seems to work as expected despite the error messages and failure status.
> >
> > Runs without any messages or failure under Cygwin stable 3.4.6.
>
> The interface mentioned above is known to be wonky on various systems.
> You might need to re-build tar in oder for it to detect any changed
> level of wonkiness and adapt accordingly.

On Cygwin 3.4.7, recompiling tar from the source package fixes this
problem; the resulting binary then seems to be fine on Cygwin 3.4.6 as
well.

Please could tar 1.34 be re-packaged?

All best,


David

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019