X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EF26C38582B0
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1686754148;
	bh=T0nU/7ZTRnZIT0Js61oA0GZJdDiKe784xLCA8JiCp4s=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	From:Reply-To:From;
	b=keDlHkTZTnvpz6YelweWuXRUlb/tx+9SYYMXS4ZI8BoagN2SLN+tZLylaoFwaVeMQ
	UM1Y2LD3aqWMEatSxO0+bJv4w2TIgMPgCL8t/8/YaZjITiXICHmLDqcqsM7T9SeOh/
	ImC2pPPDcK0bhHnMwTtfPBZu0DvjwW6nImF7/YkM=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org DD66C3858C53
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686754132; x=1689346132;
	h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
	:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=9GhAIk7zpqRda7gpsZKTVJ1CFsIYD8yu08g4f48TeNU=;
	b=iYcWm1CTd0J+RSmaJmRxkXVO46ahQkkspFTYMj8wDFvVyr3bBHRZ1lT4Pxh4YAX7n2
	Xbc9WSWOzifncdDFyPIgew9UlE+po1Wm6OBic9H19EyYNAAfg3/L4+L/bAjlHfXLt99J
	8sVtOJC5DN46ImQHR+a9p9dgM8azlJjBn3s72FwG5/L2OZV+2bJeZOxjk6KZIc+OIc6M
	ceaZud6JatKD4O7Aw/WOaf+w2HJ8UZvbyuNLgnw7eyMbN2qDfAbD+pKTwc+hzF7TFXov
	WRVWQOvEqa+dH3HlsKXXW4vi8jYkhQav9YuNuRTqwVMXsJp+7rkJU+UYtclcdhJXRPB9
	CHpw==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AC+VfDzjaU8Q0JCAIT087roIqwmmJUEyk5lW1jqVhierdK/t+Ef0eFly
	8UsPR0izTqw2Mo2rhhGQYYR9gXNNNQKm59SYoDU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ACHHUZ4bs5urZB51+yYQo54eQAqAfoB1GMhVcPRDf4JDrcGfIKvoWZQMYk0jEvSs47BiT9ApmcqnaJMX4cVL0LEchiI=
X-Received:	by 2002:a0d:cbc4:0:b0:55a:5ce4:aff2 with SMTP id
	n187-20020a0dcbc4000000b0055a5ce4aff2mr1761455ywd.39.1686754132227; Wed, 14
	Jun 2023 07:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<b7a37aeabe4ce0df6b33f55088a28150 AT tiscali DOT it>
In-Reply-To:	<b7a37aeabe4ce0df6b33f55088a28150@tiscali.it>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jun 2023 16:48:41 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAB8Xom8c6V5cc-54a5tjxxGaR-CO4nTCs23yo3KkUPWTJrO8sg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: fork bug in cygheap
To:	paolo DOT zambotti AT tiscali DOT it
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	marco atzeri via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	marco atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 35EEnX9p003199

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 2:20 PM Paolo via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>
>   Hi all,
>
> I just found a bug (I think) in cygheap_fixup_in_child
> function (cygheap.cc).
> the effect is that, sometimes a command from a
> script ends with the following error message
>
> 0 [main] openssl (17784)
> child_copy: cygheap read copy failed, 0x0..0x8003D8538, done 0, windows
> pid 17784, Win32 error 299
>
> Digging a little bit in the code I found
> that commit_size in cygheap_fixup_in_child is wrongly calculated if the
> condition (child_proc_info->cygheap_max > (void *)
> CYGHEAP_STORAGE_INITIAL) is met.
>
> Currently, in that case, its value is
> evaluated as
>
> commit_size = allocsize
> (child_proc_info->cygheap_max);
>
> but I think this is wrong and it should
> be
>
> commit_size = allocsize (child_proc_info->cygheap_max) -
> CYGHEAP_STORAGE_LOW;
>
> The wrong value avoids the successful execution of
> the following second VirtualAlloc and the the error in child_copy
> function.
>
> I tried to recompile the cygwin dll with the above change and
> indeed the error disappears.
>
> I'm I correct?
> Paolo.
>

it looks like
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-developers/2023-April/012620.html

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -