X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E8168385702C
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1682019136;
	bh=mHiHeUhgzC1CHlJ9eVA1wjnBCly4NN6WQcu6L9qef2c=;
	h=To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	From:Reply-To:From;
	b=Sh8UvxjSVEuxc+OfeCv1q5RCQDRNXVU7wiXOXkcPZdkM7o/3/VybS3cufM+4tl0KW
	9B3HuveMw/pWzgUQPgBowRvbSF0z8yLNvffo9Tp/MDfG723XeRdsEwRzl8dccNVctB
	bzwMUu+Iy/RmGjXcYTpg/uHfbj8LBPHbW34wCObY=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8E9273858C83
ARC-Seal:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1682019098; cv=none;
	d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002;
	b=SPTVZBcAVxL89OuaUlZFvXeLni1D8Rosrrj9TCHRamdtFaGxn1eOpYFgFB17SffKTM
	QEu3nOlft37hZHazl/KsddxU+xtk7pZrIlghCE2EMwq8di5FI10CpNqrYSuE6xmeRjNM
	/QsXsix71IjNqqfZZT5+/FsLSP9pQfqMsIApTGkf+Gvf48r/Q7wb1KIWNIHKhHBxk1cF
	XvdzNcthEs/NQ6b94wNH0Tx6rm2VlnQkeql8WSlaJ4U4l5NbIpGhu9u2gJozikSa4A+u
	DLV1epicc0SjyJJLWpn/1XwNt7t/wPJKExp8ry4jsoYQn7r10KdV1/tASB5BFuxQIlRM
	gRXQ==
ARC-Message-Signature:	i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1682019098;
	s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date:
	From:Subject:Sender;
	bh=R4dtXiZ1zOpmv2Sxj7U2EmbD7oZFJXlBI0GkAvuKOBU=;
	b=hhEf+ChZONonZ068UVig5TSdxa4l/uXsmFzxYaLt0v4vRhEPH18aLoMKG7gFdGWDHz
	+d4kITDkEykdOf2qzWg8rUT3FgWwSkbHoe7vfTssKi9TgNZU+cqd4R/wAsV5o6BHOks1
	FtGb8XrriAw7r7jaG6Dae5t0JKYWkNcVEewz0jHBcnuF0sGI28o6DgEbW1lMMyoKcz3R
	z7GeEfJFK11xdOQzmjujTJWecNaBWpC9KijKo/evrBiyhwmCut0CZ4tMpCDMgWi3yBrC
	dRVXNuFE4RDyUm7EtIG3gbc2ptgLWxEKy6VTFGDFi8bd+Tn/VGU8aShKoli5PI+NYl5i
	LWdQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results:	i=1; strato.com;
	arc=none;
	dkim=none
X-RZG-CLASS-ID:	mo00
X-RZG-AUTH:	":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH0WWb0LN8XZoH94zq68+3cfpPDj/1vgIuvkaOwJLsXaUZx50Vobw=="
To:	gs-cygwin DOT com AT gluelogic DOT com
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: posix_spawn facility
Date:	Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:31:38 +0200
Message-ID:	<2162092.C4sosBPzcN@nimes>
In-Reply-To:	<ZEGHF4jr9PaV0E88@xps13>
References:	<1752276 DOT 7aRn1RRit1 AT nimes> <4892432 DOT 0VBMTVartN AT nimes>
	<ZEGHF4jr9PaV0E88 AT xps13>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Bruno Haible via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Bruno Haible <bruno AT clisp DOT org>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id 33KJWhU8016455

Glenn wrote:
> > > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winbase/ns-winbase-startupinfoexa
> > > 
> > > and the PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_HANDLE_LIST argument described in
> > > 
> > > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/processthreadsapi/nf-processthreadsapi-updateprocthreadattribute
> > ...
> Excellent (very technical) article on the subject:
> 
> Programmatically controlling which handles are inherited by new processes in Win32
> https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20111216-00/?p=8873

It's nice to see an example for PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_HANDLE_LIST.

But the article exaggerates a problem:
  "But all this inheritability fiddling still had a fatal flaw: What
   if two threads within the same process both call Create­Process but
   disagree on which handles they want to be inherited?"
The answer, overlooked in the article, is to use DuplicateHandle
and set the inheritability of the duplicate to true. Concurrently
running posix_spawn invocations in other threads will not see the
duplicates, since they only see HANDLEs that are assigned to file
descriptors, not HANDLEs that merely reside in some data structure
in memory.

Bruno




-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -