delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Filter: | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B91A385772E |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; |
s=default; t=1681974936; | |
bh=HXScskKppK5apZEJrhkeN3PnHnxsVz4ou4S7gVlJdNU=; | |
h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: | |
List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: | |
From:Reply-To:From; | |
b=W5wb4n7Y+4epiraQQTPAs+wm+WhYDSh634SUkeJ74z5XBLg5OIfklBVrtFseSZup4 | |
oAOKjrty+L+sEmOUCFoh2CIU6SsTwee6WGVbFe62eBEHs+xBWeFbToo7nKA1hPhoka | |
93hrakalUuZvEYCRAJM0SIVUdZviTB0b6nfbuOrY= | |
X-Original-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org EBEA03858D37 |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on |
server2.sourceware.org | |
X-Spam-Language: | en |
X-Spam-Relay-Country: | |
X-Spam-DCC: | B=MGTINTERNET; R=smtp1.atof.net 1170; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 |
X-Spam-RBL: | |
X-Spam-PYZOR: | Reported 0 times. |
Date: | Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:14:50 -0400 |
To: | Bruno Haible <bruno AT clisp DOT org> |
Cc: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: posix_spawn facility |
Message-ID: | <ZEDmai2kO+dfxWut@xps13> |
References: | <1752276 DOT 7aRn1RRit1 AT nimes> <ZD0O442kk5d7VKrx AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
<5022555 DOT upeRZZJTqa AT nimes> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <5022555.upeRZZJTqa@nimes> |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, |
SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, | |
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 | |
X-BeenThere: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailman-Version: | 2.1.29 |
List-Id: | General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe> | |
List-Archive: | <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help> |
List-Subscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe> | |
From: | "gs-cygwin.com--- via Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-To: | gs-cygwin DOT com AT gluelogic DOT com |
Errors-To: | cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com |
Sender: | "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 33K7G09W020979 |
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 08:44:51PM +0200, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote: > Btw, there are two more functions in the posix_spawn family meanwhile: > * posix_spawn_file_actions_addchdir_np > implemented by glibc [1], musl libc, macOS, FreeBSD [2], Solaris ≥ 11.3 > used by a few packages (Firefox, Chromium, Rust) > * posix_spawn_file_actions_addfchdir_np > implemented in glibc, musl libc > but not used by any package so far [3]. > > The next POSIX will contain these functions (without the _np suffix).[4] > > Bruno > > [1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17405 > [2] https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=posix_spawn_file_actions_adddup2&apropos=0&sektion=3&manpath=FreeBSD+11-current&format=html > [3] https://codesearch.debian.net/ > [4] https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1208 With regards to [3] above, the next lighttpd release (lighttpd 1.4.70) will use posix_spawn_file_actions_addfchdir_np(), where available, for spawning CGI programs. I have not yet tested under cygwin, but under Linux the overhead of initial CGI process creation can be greatly reduced by using posix_spawn() instead of fork(),execve(). The speedup is inversely proportional to how much work the target script performs (compared to the overhead of initial process creation). On x86_64 Linux, running a minimal C program for CGI can be ~60% faster in lighttpd when using posix_spawn()! When running a minimal /bin/sh program for CGI, the speedup is "only" ~20%! (Those numbers were obtained from running h2load and weighttp microbenchmarks with the minimal CGI programs.) minimal C program for CGI (compiled gcc -O3): #include <unistd.h> static const char resp[] = "Status: 200\n\n"; int main(void) { write(STDOUT_FILENO, resp, sizeof(resp)-1); return 0; } minimal /bin/sh program for CGI: #!/bin/sh printf 'Status: 200\n\n' Cheers, Glenn -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |