X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 56A303857714
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1681940027;
	bh=7i8MAJ1yizmfeNws7A9An5VMD0CUbf9OdRyU95ZGMt8=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	From;
	b=TOqU9EvKzcuRhtNJD8qk19f8ylFAj5iGT95+heh6vJV+nytiUFY1cEPXOvQZuOFdi
	CqGvTVq9C0eg0o3GOtkg5qW9B+GoQZ306/vWYieS7n7DkZBHtfWugl4p6LGHwKl0mm
	CfpTGb92uDHluhdd5PTyuJPBCrhfRsHWq+imguFE=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E914D3858CDA
Message-ID:	<ca05e9c7-fd8e-0bed-336c-e28c31ea0b27@cs.umass.edu>
Date:	Wed, 19 Apr 2023 17:33:30 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject:	Re: posix_spawn_file_actions_add[f]chdir_np
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1752276 DOT 7aRn1RRit1 AT nimes> <5022555 DOT upeRZZJTqa AT nimes>
	<ZD+lJeaXDZ8V4WWk AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1962645 DOT 3CdzvNlvnA AT nimes>
	<ZEADMM0Ri7NlU/Di AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<ZEA9Z+c64vxuvlC2 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To:	<ZEA9Z+c64vxuvlC2@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Eliot Moss via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

A wondering in all this ...

Does having more spawn support imply that bash (for example)
may end up doing faster process spawning, skipping some of
high overhead we've lived with for a long time because of
the Windows process spawning model?

Regards - Eliot Moss

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -