X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9CDD13857703
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1681872019;
	bh=6NsV2WdMaHFbc7ef99gglTYUL0NpMnJ635qSXHNlVFg=;
	h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	From:Reply-To:From;
	b=my2QvNF/ar/u4Ia0ma/JwvtU84VUCx9RVjwKBkqzLe2QQG3B+LxpSf1vp/dVsc1nd
	Mb+uT+ItSLfxjiJK276G9XfpxnYXDA/OQJXCZbi8epyWmwfaYB7oT193oitR2sp4gx
	V7fTzjdUuvvn4XA3nxs11gjHh6mVAuD4yTJ/LI9I=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6AC3A3858D39
X-MC-Unique:	E1sKYz5vM0-ZgGfXhnpOxw-1
Date:	Tue, 18 Apr 2023 21:39:56 -0500
To:	Bruno Haible <bruno AT clisp DOT org>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: posix_spawn facility
Message-ID:	<wqmniudnbjv4rdm4wa5a4lxbfoipvmdmsvi646ndaksfgne4s3@4xfdvvdd4g62>
References:	<1752276 DOT 7aRn1RRit1 AT nimes> <ZD5h973pS0tVenD0 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<xsn3qmrcprucviwtwoehm5hfgna5nogttqgud3ut6t2craprjp AT 6u5dgtopjfig>
	<1741636 DOT G7SD5HZVK5 AT nimes>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1741636.G7SD5HZVK5@nimes>
User-Agent:	NeoMutt/20230407
X-Scanned-By:	MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score:	0
X-Mimecast-Originator:	redhat.com
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
	DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Eric Blake via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 33J2ehrJ020574

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 12:10:34AM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Eric Blake wrote:
> > we now have implementations in the wild that differ in behavior, and
> > use security as a reason for the divergence, it is worth getting that
> > clarified in POSIX.  I'll file a bug against POSIX shortly
> 
> For the reference, the systems that return ENOEXEC for posix_spawnp
> attempting to execute a script without #! marker are:
>   - glibc/Linux ≥ 2.15
>   - glibc/Hurd ≥ 2.33 (commit 13adfa34aff03fd9f1c1612b537a0d736ddb6c2b)
>   - musl libc

POSIX issue now filed as
https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1674; although we'll have
to see if my wording is acceptable or if it settles on something a bit
looser (such as implementation-defined as to whether an sh fallback is
attempted, rather than outright forbidden).

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -