X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4F06C3857722
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1681723144;
	bh=5VEb9le5vtsztYMR7PJRQQc9qnk4ZIkidAJrCDLZgyo=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=XD2dixo5ygkWYh1PewIJ3CT3yqzEHOY3CSLKF5bD1OdXTcI5Qc1eataPslI2S9V0G
	tTz4ERhRI/9BzDQVUeMEIY/s2q5Pj47UhxTl78hw7/K6OV1WU+Uy1uI/N9EYkXyTJb
	5wddxyaMfV1n+GXm+9CicJEEv07U6mbom50m5qPc=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A74273858C50
Date:	Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:18:27 +0200
To:	Bruno Haible <bruno AT clisp DOT org>
Subject:	Re: posix_spawn facility
Message-ID:	<ZD0O442kk5d7VKrx@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	Bruno Haible <bruno AT clisp DOT org>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<1752276 DOT 7aRn1RRit1 AT nimes>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<1752276.7aRn1RRit1@nimes>
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

Hi Bruno,

On Apr 16 13:46, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> AFAIU, Cygwin has a working posix_spawn[p] implementation since 2020
> (commit 3fbfcd11fb09d5f47af3043ee47ec5c7d863d872, 2020-08-03, Cygwin 3.1.7).
                                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> [...]
> Would it be possible to change Cygwin's posix_spawnp implementation,
> so that both tests succeed?

Basically, yes, but...

> Disclaimer: I have done my tests with Cygwin 2.9.0; so, if things have
                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^
					2017-09-07

I'm a bit puzzled. You quote that only Cygwin 3.1.7 has the fixed
posix_spawn, but then you test this with a version three years older?

Sorry, but... wouldn't it at least make sense to test this with a more
recent version of Cygwin first?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -