X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 72A7C3858C53
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1673988400;
	bh=ItYk08Yq7dFKmj2sWmXD9df/qc5lk/zbeZ8kQ8O9BY0=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=DRGYDTeNcky+vlAslEL2WJBiO0wuvWBZo8hn0ZoyA0TL6YNSRPMIEB184uvCHuBFv
	kMdVX1aE4vjZ6BlrVWi2rSoSqN8YfNe3//36iyjE49fb6BAkkM8rJgbv0ceHbgSpQW
	MkBmGSI3tWPLSDqdsjLiX1QnWS9C/yq9ZfmGLOPI=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 17 Jan 2023 21:46:20 +0100
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin 3.4.3 and 3.5.0... hangs in make, top, procps, ls
	/proc/PID/...
Message-ID:	<Y8cJHDaXbQ2ZQSzn@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4a4427cc-422b-1d14-015e-26523e620d9b AT Shaw DOT ca>
	<20230102113201 DOT 476c10bef7a5643bddc00762 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20230102143803 DOT 53f89d07a545a1bdd596e1e8 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20230102172147 DOT 83789d400bb0400cb8c8ca74 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<Y7wUuNUbXBANLdIA AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<20230116180213 DOT 0e03a896f512d784933f54da AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<Y8Ulug5IS7IGc15w AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<20230116234532 DOT f567e64fe7bf9a0a13704af9 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<Y8VqvgP8rA5SX/Or AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<Y8XE3gykn7dTPrmU AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Y8XE3gykn7dTPrmU@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:mM4f4PCpC24q0eJjpZmklBIO8qYrqzkU9PZR3jimkuLJSC0Sbmo
	OYEEwnnm3pdiUNp10AyneYE4Tfz1A9TKMc3xJi/oP6+BA9Dq6a7PjJXk5KjT304CmYTBZKw
	iMLNN5j6cDHhcBDtZRr1lR/MzsMLKPWQbPL2NvgAZuZ9jTVrhvCRU/4sR/OZQAJJxVnP1Ms
	MrfQ8tiZRxa7GGHLaUtrA==
UI-OutboundReport:	notjunk:1;M01:P0:KkjaDTpGWt0=;+m6UxXo0d6wXlSy/AXFjW1Ae1E7
	L8svKJybbUxRNEDPjkAu4+L5Oe+KDRSND5szhKIX4dPXaOtgqJX1epNYFG1gbY8N2vSkA3Z3a
	uBKRh0XdhD2t2rsnRYt8HUUhZI3BEn9TKUyCRxw93vspffO5g4DHHDwP3leQj+WfMmnj5fss1
	OfeXNcA4M0NTz3SJVdny4MJSPxsX4EVEps5I7imKBYTIBQHMR593sWalEDX1pVCVeNs5/AqT9
	N2EqAceXQ8t6mYbHtYWwVKZtYIfXsL7djVUDp3sqhwgJNgi9sDXp7khFsb0WiFuWHq0EYXRvm
	D6rm79dloZHCrRDQuSNHxwMbSbhTwzkPiYu/U0D5HO/4YrLLw5bDrr+klkp2XnL1aPXKzL9Rb
	hwlejqnoVxaMA7ZDQLtoASuHW3SVRx8ksxfgXWgq18sLgK3snYswlNRnIHKo2OYSSoMbTWYn/
	YReQTLoIjMAtY9Y4HrhGBIzpba/jz5/8RnNTCbS1raG8YP73Dwu6kqsytfoS1uEM4kx7nulC/
	x3s+gjAX0JmW6NjdvAyWl2iVVXEwiqFp3r/MJ9Uu47ScvXb/TUfc+wM1acNPj51wFCH/flrvY
	wAu5qBY735SjH8KWWJu0NNPAOgf4Ep3SR10uIXuQlytbp2Lt1qV85YVhcbgvNGbg9DpSkFiei
	QeOSx1N3cjg3fgOKydHfxsmRWwgo1WFwukwUSzfPsw==
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-102.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0,
	GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_FAIL, SPF_HELO_NONE,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

Hi Takashi,

On Jan 16 22:42, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> On Jan 16 16:18, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > Actually, I' running your testcase on two machines in parallel now for
> > quite some time, which only one hunk of 60675f1a7eb2 reverted, i.e.
> > 
> > diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/mm/shared.cc b/winsup/cygwin/mm/shared.cc
> > index 893b20d289b4..6d6d2940b6d4 100644
> > --- a/winsup/cygwin/mm/shared.cc
> > +++ b/winsup/cygwin/mm/shared.cc
> > @@ -140,7 +140,11 @@ open_shared (const WCHAR *name, int n, HANDLE& shared_h, DWORD size,
> >    if (*m == SH_JUSTCREATE || *m == SH_JUSTOPEN)
> >      addr = NULL;
> >    else
> > -    addr = (void *) region_address[*m];
> > +    {
> > +      addr = (void *) region_address[*m];
> > +      VirtualFree (addr, 0, MEM_RELEASE);
> > +    }
> > +
> >  
> >    WCHAR map_buf[MAX_PATH];
> >    WCHAR *mapname = NULL;
> > 
> > So far (and knocking on wood madly while writing this) the mapping
> > problem didn't show up once.  Maybe you'd like to try the same?
> 
> Never mind, I encountered another error.  After a bit more debugging
> I think I understand the problem now, and  I'm just in the process of
> reworking open_shared.  This may take a day or two.  Stay tuned.

I pushed some patches to fix this issue.  Excessive debugging indicated
that the reason cygcheck fails in this way is:

- It's a non-Cygwin process which

- is built with high-entropy ASLR and

- tries to load the Cygwin DLL dynamically and

- therefore suffers from the fact that recent Cygwin code doesn't
  expect that certain memory regions are used by Windows itself.
  Which they are, due to the high-entropy stuff.

The patches are supposed to make the code less rigid in terms of the
addresses of certain memory regions, as well as dropping the
high-entropy VA flag from builds of strace and cygcheck, both of which
are loading the Cygwin DLL dynamically as part of their job.

The test release 3.5.0-0.116.g8d318bf142f7 contains the patches, for
everybody to try.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -