X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AED733858CDA
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1673284431;
	bh=W50hWGMNfd2oD62aVDAKAjq6GkyC0ZuUHgAoeuoa9fs=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=RNh1nHj8vVaJaVcN4OLiAseVTxLx54JHllSDxcbpyaI1D31CENONhCSXPnAH/7H0b
	ng7GfW+Szcc6UA/KtVc+5bPLT0xddV6FKff/eeRHbAcNiRQzLEuZMX3VKRvjFj88D4
	qlFNrkB48AoWF+Pmp6m7+8EgSnf/KrKutQbN29F4=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 9 Jan 2023 18:13:26 +0100
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin 3.4.3 and 3.5.0... hangs in make, top, procps, ls
	/proc/PID/...
Message-ID:	<Y7xLNqMa8zdIkRfj@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com,
	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
References:	<4a4427cc-422b-1d14-015e-26523e620d9b AT Shaw DOT ca>
	<20230102113201 DOT 476c10bef7a5643bddc00762 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20230102113201.476c10bef7a5643bddc00762@nifty.ne.jp>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:NX2XH6Z1x2PYJGwqE/rp2DC4b9OsvPrPAB7AbH0EC9aj9Wk+ZcD
	PZC9GP9w22UyJaGvqu6XlvGG14DW+bqT/pVdrdP+BzsICknKoe6xfvVt8it/uaNAZ5Mq/PR
	MvOw9MiWYSL0X7YRoRfzZVnukaFXEbCfmt3rlHsDgZB2RIEhxd7HEYEk9dcsv6fN4JBEdAt
	gGyL07Wtpx7XI8iJ0k15g==
UI-OutboundReport:	notjunk:1;M01:P0:qR7dIedXOKU=;+6yc8Umd5SDWaxMiWwblGmgQoG+
	bGwNiarLtTpyTRRCcGeBhG0pWPavr8a0hivDRCUdZrubL+bGv57SI8YaikKDdL+yzKJQzXAmO
	0TqLc573leGsJO4pgcbmpU9/Lc89P74shyJlQuUsj4NbfK2AZa3gyKdE/Q3oVErmBzVYsH9jS
	8DDLD16JDaXff9ZXmhf9qN/SbezcdvYAg77VTujiNBfEAAQrBnsN+4rZTAa133hTC/oV5+5Sq
	3sEthre4DC+lFnoD+Y7IcySYUdORp4SbcMg/SzuZOji7aXz2z7gXjnOjZ/NFYhUQ5Nz8faq6d
	NMPm21kEQ4KU+7m4rJxe9VPai+QkI4qmSGGrgx2U5M3Pa5VrWvS6U/0fRGTBkt4NNnqDEawVQ
	pqz22IkwyQfVAwn1lZrf/Ns3IGITcDrZP9SGEOypgmHJgx3CmttLsuZZvUlJbtoBTrljvsDNn
	KsyZdRcakYlyXRtOPLonM7zZmLWsFkb7X9rGlY4LJgd6t79HJfQEIcDIjAeK5H2YyG4MYRUAY
	jJxxLnMJOy8JPDkJ0UWzcUyOhYxf8+96E5Zh9okzWuboulSY6lCGuNF6Wsgs8+VhT0Le/Tr2z
	o5hm0JZrAqpKE23/sdjNnx7jOWTKEoaggvLylfKIlxBxabSFLPe04491j23jRQm/zE/vlLOMv
	SIGJeuiEuXY2UzqxnT9MK/eHqlGtYclS2SpkNPs9mA==
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-102.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0,
	GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_FAIL, SPF_HELO_NONE,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>,
	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Jan  2 11:32, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 21:59:45 -0700
> Brian Inglis wrote:
> > I got some hangs (deadlock?) between (parallel?) make jobs, top, procps, and 
> > even ls /proc/*/ when trying to cygport all check curl or look at the process 
> > statuses when builds hung under Cygwin 3.4.3 and 3.5.0-0.69...
> > [...]
> I have looked into this issue a bit, and found that
> q->sigtls becomes sometimes NULL and access violation
> occurs at the following code.
> 
> winsup/cygwin/sigproc.cc: 1378
> 		if (q->sigtls->sigmask & (bit = SIGTOMASK (q->si.si_signo)))
> 		  {
> 		    tl_entry = cygheap->find_tls (q->si.si_signo, issig_wait);
> 
> I'm not sure why this happens, however it seems that
> the following patch fixes the issue.
> 
> diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/sigproc.cc b/winsup/cygwin/sigproc.cc
> index ce36c8be3..90eaa2a47 100644
> --- a/winsup/cygwin/sigproc.cc
> +++ b/winsup/cygwin/sigproc.cc
> @@ -1375,6 +1375,8 @@ wait_sig (VOID *)
>  	    *pack.mask = 0;
>  	    while ((q = q->next))
>  	      {
> +		if (q->sigtls == NULL)
> +		  continue;
>  		if (q->sigtls->sigmask & (bit = SIGTOMASK (q->si.si_signo)))
>  		  {
>  		    tl_entry = cygheap->find_tls (q->si.si_signo, issig_wait);
> 
> Corinna, could you please have a look?

If q->sigtls is NULL, the signal is nevertheless waiting for being
handled.  It's just not directed at a specific thread.  Beats me, why
this didn't occur in my testing.  The process signal info should contain
the process-wide mask of pending signals as well, obviously, so the
following patch should do the right thing:

diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/sigproc.cc b/winsup/cygwin/sigproc.cc
index ce36c8be37fb..86e4e607ab7e 100644
--- a/winsup/cygwin/sigproc.cc
+++ b/winsup/cygwin/sigproc.cc
@@ -1375,7 +1375,8 @@ wait_sig (VOID *)
 	    *pack.mask = 0;
 	    while ((q = q->next))
 	      {
-		if (q->sigtls->sigmask & (bit = SIGTOMASK (q->si.si_signo)))
+		_cygtls *sigtls = q->sigtls ?: _main_tls;
+		if (sigtls->sigmask & (bit = SIGTOMASK (q->si.si_signo)))
 		  {
 		    tl_entry = cygheap->find_tls (q->si.si_signo, issig_wait);
 		    if (tl_entry)

Can you confirm?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -