X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8888B3858406
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-01.nifty.com 2690Mojf013070
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.ne.jp;
	s=dec2015msa; t=1657326171;
	bh=VZ5NFAqQMKd1khk7nsH2OD9M20E1Yw3gtWaX8FO5BBc=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=AJv0d+7QV6H47LJb/OPgZ/tzXupnnamUs9mUfnfZT10A+GUdWOzqW2Wr8LiOh3u2x
	RZay3wxZfwKSjdtqJ9Fdk8rPh2CE1c5O6MA/ExIbTHNH4mTWhQWXzOlO3hba72PN8A
	YQ3CSGxezz9k5522PZEuHDK+d59QKURzjyaPuQ0MMieDH1aypWWmUI5bW47U/MdgJo
	pl8+Y4ZfgaU5U5zQA5kP/E4FH+1puXXTVQqN+hkEi0aiQb/1l1cJAX1CoM+0Ltbepn
	urAzEgWCaEpp++cMN2c8eq4D1COa1rtWbfEAIF+y5Om879sDp5+7zeMLFemEF6hOoN
	wyXbsngQOvl+Q==
X-Nifty-SrcIP:	[119.150.44.95]
Date:	Sat, 9 Jul 2022 09:22:51 +0900
From:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: dumper does not produce core that gdb recognizes?
Message-Id:	<20220709092251.a7a946962f44576fc915168c@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<DM8PR09MB7095CB60032523FD08EA4ECFA5829@DM8PR09MB7095.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References:	<DM8PR09MB7095F85835743C5A9E045F1FA5829 AT DM8PR09MB7095 DOT namprd09 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
	<308d675e-84a8-6d53-6ea9-a5a3abb258c6 AT cornell DOT edu>
	<DM8PR09MB7095CB60032523FD08EA4ECFA5829 AT DM8PR09MB7095 DOT namprd09 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 23:09:27 +0000
"Lavrentiev, Anton \(NIH/NLM/NCBI\) \[C\] wrote:
> > Try using a more recent gdb.  I just tried your test case with gdb-12.1-1
> > (available as a test release), and it seemed to work.
> 
> Thanks for the quick response...  Though I'd rather not use test releases.

The latest version of gdb that is not a test version is 11.2. But
you are using 9.2.

> The dumper binary and gdb in my case are supposed to be consistent with each other
> (installed from the set of release packages on the same day via setup)...  So I don't
> really understand the discrepancy here:  are you saying that dumper can produce a core
> that current gdb cannot read?  But that's bizarre!

Even if so, the combination of latest dumper.exe (in cygwin 3.3.5
package) and gdb 11.2 do not have such a problem. Therefore, we
have nothing to do for that.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -