X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 829303858012
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1657117436;
	bh=OyIzMBBgZL6GOIYWuZpX+pdDQVKRHndFc5bJgNm78CA=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	Reply-To:From;
	b=TSgTawekMnclOiEXj1zBoEUDx1B58EpMeCVu72lkhN0KkWCaq7e5RuBZAfajhXBIt
	IWZlHM0ehFDTcc/aazMYGn64rWcwZRg+5xx3zuCkQ8Z+g2ZM3kYX9HdtLtvnxHWSxW
	eLjhxo1MtzbzN+Se8LCSQOVOqGhjWbg7pflzlaV4=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C2CF93858D39
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2022 16:22:47 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Typo in <sys/select.h>?
Message-ID:	<YsWat3DLV9KEH/UG@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<DM8PR09MB70954B30D740E778EB65BA41A5819 AT DM8PR09MB7095 DOT namprd09 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
	<1c3256fd-ed7b-8ee3-adcd-b1d8ef2fff84 AT cornell DOT edu>
	<YsU9APd87h5vUJtZ AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<ea3de3f0-ed55-bfcf-f543-a95e38b98599 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>
	<YsWZHryhvF3+WcEv AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<YsWZHryhvF3+WcEv@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:K8XSiJCaZqpdKAS0YBNG8e0vRTyhKi8GlnvYTN6sH3bfZMa/UyF
	JHwxi+DrfCg9g9GsqbsLplkoBqaWRN3DZZW1D+OOipI+vOTY/JnjaucloHWJO95IiQqSSME
	gRvupo36hq7HNJuhP6wjNXw2ujg/crtf4IqQcei4gmuUXuoYchNpFw8xX+EO7KkdYb5xNw/
	PHCdLXMs7V/8UhCO2bnLQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V03:K0:HC0yktORBr4=:yjL/1Oo/Dt2+hCOXuoJLDr
	fyuhvwmVC7px7mtNcDntTOaVjy7uqPCCIhyDCPoG0/AzbJPWnEVcJDStyymTv07Kqks70Xp5t
	bO2Ku7qeNn2RzgG89TVCjjptftFN4JNjOuTXrGteSeRLuacFVNwcgSjxZMCS5xiYJr+IZDEau
	udf1uE6Gy7TdDRI8ZKR9kdTtNxoEzqdKwOE2DmWP5ybSxHLQdSthC5pnGHa6a5cRUmaYL6n8U
	nXHirDuh86ti5vChwojQRdxk/UeFHNbVqUzQHGNURkproIDdP/ADmNVO7XmEpLHyddKVxsALQ
	EMt0uU+zL+WYHeZ4rr0QXs+gPMl0/yV9McABPPxG88m2kJqaRin5zv+8o3+11W3rMPpmTU8iA
	Nmn9MAa+gbJgafUg4ZPhJc0ptRb+fKnM9AEDE9gtvxu9CM75oTa2IMN/v68DfmLGW97AycSpp
	2A8J6TQZdHJaU9WUqdzzfBKyGf0z5tKXQbg/C1YYEWhBasm5nbmxUoTQjop1HNHTdH+KD6MVM
	rRGj4vSC78DJimXsrfztdVkHJ19GWKt3a6l9x9z4W3EMZYls/H56gzgslV1Jro9sNjHhuZi87
	UYNeNbhVEGq1am3TsGmut4HojCaOHp9Zroh/ElVrI5yC06PrFqS0sVXocXRxdAjV9sXMNClrM
	fbXO1c83mazdFSI9bYzOYt698AbaIj9ZL4uXQAQM4/94cxzlq+M8Lr1zQi5DcCqtZ2WFoJF/Y
	L+/ztSjND6CMwDb+aNdEeFNHYymqpSV2Tqp/PzU1QUPb8TekOz6uB6w5bKo=
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-95.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_FAIL, SPF_HELO_NONE, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Jul  6 16:15, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul  6 15:01, Jon Turney wrote:
> > Remember that 64 is MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS for WaitForMultipleObjects(), the
> > underlying Win32 API used to implement select(), so using more than 64 hits
> > some complex code to work around that...
> 
> This isn't what FD_SETSIZE is about.  FD_SETSIZE does *NOT* define the
> maximum count of fd's in an fd_set.
> 
> It defines the maximum fd number usable in an fd_set.
> 
> So if FD_SETSIZE is defined low enough:
> 
>   #define FD_SETSIZE 3
>   #include <sys/select.h>
> 
>   /* Only fd's 0, 1, and 2 will be allowed in this fd_set */
>   fd_set set;
> 
>   FD_ZERO (&set);
>   /* This will probaly set fd to 3 */
>   fd = open ("foo", O_RDONLY); 
>   /* So this will (hopefully) fail */
>   FD_SET (fd, &set);

Right, this isn't quite how it works, given fd_set is a bitfield using
unsigned long as basetype under the hood.  This should just outline
the idea behind FD_SETSIZE.


Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -