X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 496B43857BA9
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
	header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	spf=none smtp.mailfrom=systematicsw.ab.ca
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.4 cv=SMhR6cjH c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=62b0c8fd
	a=oHm12aVswOWz6TMtn9zYKg==:117 a=oHm12aVswOWz6TMtn9zYKg==:17
	a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=94nOnFI1EgyDtX4ev68A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Message-ID:	<3f4a8b91-a53f-201d-45e4-d1f469652b6e@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:22:36 -0600
MIME-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/91.10.0
Subject:	Re: Bug in Control-d handling?
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<827e2006-2aae-9f7f-9c3f-eef3a7c6e793 AT cornell DOT edu>
	<20220620175935 DOT 924a49feb13156f1a3cf3da4 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20220620192223 DOT 2e0a084a7c093939b1c7c8d6 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
From:	Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Organization:	Systematic Software
In-Reply-To:	<20220620192223.2e0a084a7c093939b1c7c8d6@nifty.ne.jp>
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4xfFLyU+xTUlY7De8vbdm1k6i4O74bTvlanKkuhYeEtooCVm4UhTrlbyGbEtKVhG4FfTG89O8PIItH4hqr+GPAj2ecuWBJPNkqxfXzaOq4knIz5LDMLUND
	xkXKyeV5wodySs7+DI2BlkhG2913qEWvxvgkF/S3WDBrGNEsK2CO61iHU+yB+H23lJ6tP34k7WFpS7Fr8oi2P4yKdAE5K6VyYh4=
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-1170.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0,
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On 2022-06-20 04:22, Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 17:59:35 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
>> Isn't this a bug of newlib? Try following code.
>>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>> 	printf("%d\n", getchar());
>> 	printf("%d\n", feof(stdin));
>> 	printf("%d\n", getchar());
>> 	return 0;
>> }
>>
>> If you press Ctrl-D at the first getchar(), the second getchar()
>> does not return EOF while it does in linux.
>>
>> The following patch seems to resolve the issue.
>>
>> diff --git a/newlib/libc/stdio/refill.c b/newlib/libc/stdio/refill.c
>> index ccedc7af7..843163b7e 100644
>> --- a/newlib/libc/stdio/refill.c
>> +++ b/newlib/libc/stdio/refill.c
>> @@ -47,11 +47,9 @@ __srefill_r (struct _reent * ptr,
>>   
>>     fp->_r = 0;			/* largely a convenience for callers */
>>   
>> -#ifndef __CYGWIN__
>>     /* SysV does not make this test; take it out for compatibility */
>>     if (fp->_flags & __SEOF)
>>       return EOF;
>> -#endif
>>   
>>     /* if not already reading, have to be reading and writing */
>>     if ((fp->_flags & __SRD) == 0)
>>
>> However, I am not sure what this #ifndef __CYGWIN__ is for.
> 
> Ah, I confirmed that System V (Solaris 11.4) behaves like that.
> Does cygwin aim for System V compatibility???

The emphasis has shifted over the years from Solaris etc. compatibility 
when Sparc desktops were ubiquitous (and I switched from DJGPP to 
Cygwin) to Linux etc. compatibility as PCs displaced RISC boxes.
I think ACLs were the last new feature where Solaris was considered vs 
POSIX.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -