X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4A1923858D28
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-02.nifty.com 2410pXRw008875
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.ne.jp;
	s=dec2015msa; t=1651366293;
	bh=WNjrUmPVjtZixOJ5pxRFO0V/BJkcd7eZHw3ERNvU8Lo=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=B8VVin+UcRh0Zdz6OynCk+LaxrswvG38hUeTpbMxSa8ZqVpC0B4nvMY64DDBWFfH1
	Yt2yki4GWI+USB0iWw8g46AopWsJHRJguNGS+9vto5yLLAEUqB2mdM0yUmRhRdkCOw
	JMbIHLezDqRDeD3zJiEHnWekD3nu2K+fIGYRf1F+NDsd+1RBH9DFREfkmqQ83zhdwO
	iIro9mx7Ov7sHbhkPIa8SM4Urr4L8dxGPURk2TNn1N3+XJtABrh+Iqt1wSf4PWoHCB
	xzJUgF4DeJnPLNGz1zDsTQqXlUdGockF+Xa0fUhmmKIZsV8UduydxoGEfrDNFfmKWj
	LnGX69N8wbTGQ==
X-Nifty-SrcIP:	[119.150.44.95]
Date:	Sun, 1 May 2022 09:51:41 +0900
From:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: GNU make losing jobserver tokens
Message-Id:	<20220501095141.b7e39c9f08e413d49aa4fdc2@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<cac5432b-4cca-406a-7c9f-b4288dacfd0b@cornell.edu>
References:	<9b9da583-124d-9d5f-4c10-6622602ca8dc AT oracle DOT com>
	<20220401174551 DOT 820cbc148852554108397e03 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20220427231340 DOT 0bdab2d6d903dd4fb44bd12f AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<f83bea36-a759-5620-89d8-b7b1b0c601ee AT cornell DOT edu>
	<YmqgFLRX2ZH8AcpD AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<20220429000152 DOT 1fe838469e543a69586e194d AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<YmqzhlrjgMkzNz6h AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<20220429181010 DOT 01940adc0cdbabf976997a6a AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<cac5432b-4cca-406a-7c9f-b4288dacfd0b AT cornell DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:51:03 -0400
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 4/29/2022 5:10 AM, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:32:22 +0200
> > I tried to move sigproc_init() call from dll_crt0_0() to
> > fork::child() for 64bit cygwin, however, that causes hang
> > at cygwin startup.
> > 
> > Am I missing somehting?
> 
> I've never looked into the Cygwin startup code, so just ignore me if what I say 
> is nonsense.
> 
> Currently sigproc_init is called either from dll_crt0_0 or from dll_crt0_1, 
> depending on the value of dynamically_loaded.  What would happen if you always 
> call it from dll_crt0_1, right after
> 
>    cygwin_finished_initializing = true;

Thanks for the advice.
That causes hang on cygwin startup due to fork() fail :(

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -