X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B50C33858D3C
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-05.nifty.com 22IDSXEX007611
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.ne.jp;
	s=dec2015msa; t=1647610114;
	bh=IMWd3pNnJLbef24ASTpZrej/rZYobOpW6motw/wvpsw=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=gwqqnzBZya1TaMjsAuVTypM79X7kHJntgJstDo2zoPj+oVgh/zIkv2if8nzJbfah/
	7/Sju/hDTwuc+QwhcXyNO3/YxBpvOntS0OSBGJIdMRoGDMD+Px1bxIOV4B5soHbsW0
	rhp6JU7Q/qOE0IHp3StePgs+xwUkCU2ek1SWHZUqjOP85YI4NO9Qj+FtOSAZVKIPKM
	bz7MSg3fV/TdPM6uBIYxaDsOG5SmMYo5s5QrTgPiQYRUyoeACOWEi9JimqlyjApHLz
	+ShBpmPcjgCmoD0m79OZ6ZIUMtfxFB6F1xGeLCyehrUabI7LshhEQDOTG7V0u/lqBN
	r1jVd23GRwDtg==
X-Nifty-SrcIP:	[119.150.36.16]
Date:	Fri, 18 Mar 2022 22:28:36 +0900
From:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Typed characters are mis-ordered when CPU usage is high
Message-Id:	<20220318222836.7fdebd15e677d145787daf0b@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<CAGHpTBKiEi_XC8oXhYcS=9hPW=9Gd2Ep=aTdLwbxsBp4zDmqqQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAGHpTBKbqxWQ+WOc=UZH1a155gHhNc4ogVE0sP=rCw7q5xoNpQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20220302081259 DOT 2a7e522ef1a9e3e6da0aa259 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<CAGHpTBLc9waVzjKWb84C5KS+s9uKENrOMAxxfBBrvPR-zKKtPQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20220303090208 DOT 4a04e35756b7868fe9b4701d AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<CAGHpTBKU5XQJ6mjsvb94LnbJb5xj3uoRMtt3KgsMx1NjpM5hSg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20220312063625 DOT 9ca3d42d4e2e941a13fa7909 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<CAGHpTBLe0D9gQaK=4A91w5eravsygpWe001DhcB=hhrcLx6YWA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20220318132335 DOT d5635fe9fc782ed53bddf7bc AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20220318142243 DOT 1751c742ebaae47e8fba9b47 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<CAGHpTBLRzXpg77FjxT6OQPrC+12k1VYd-r-wNryEC0DZiYdQfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20220318153058 DOT 22d217eea1bb746e709da555 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<CAGHpTBKMxgUdbucTKzVzthUB4u_F5P=sOrjVnjPz-kd8YLumSA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAGHpTBLYStvKSOc8JZtCdTcziLam=xzO5eGs+VF0LGXJM8dG3A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20220318211522 DOT 936158f91219816ca5c707e7 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<CAGHpTBKiEi_XC8oXhYcS=9hPW=9Gd2Ep=aTdLwbxsBp4zDmqqQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Cc:	Orgad Shaneh <orgads AT gmail DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 15:04:31 +0200
Orgad Shaneh wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:15 PM Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> wrote:
> > Thanks. I can reproduce the issue. I think I found the cause.
> > The two unexpected things happen.
> >
> > (1) wVirtualKeyCode and wVirtualScanCode of readback key event may
> >     be null'ed even if they are not zero on WriteConsoleInputW().
> >     Therefore, memcmp() report the event is not equal.
> > (2) WriteConsoleInputW() may not be atomic. The event sequence which
> >     is written by WriteConsoleInputW() may be inserted by key input
> >     in the middle of the sequence.
> >
> > A patch for these issues is attached. Could you please test?
> 
> Awesome, looks good now. Thank you very much!
> 
> Hope this is the last bit :)

Thanks for testing!

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -