X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A27703858D3C
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org;
	dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp
Authentication-Results:	sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-06.nifty.com 22B99Ttm030929
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.ne.jp;
	s=dec2015msa; t=1646989770;
	bh=iT4O06+xHb5RnJZ/hrE49NNTuhtWbgxD4dOmlPzphzE=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KknIPTFDntnknDSHbeXPhgO7hAbg2K0K5SSlWLkCuBBqAek6faY7Ml4cyA2HPKGJ1
	wWZLvlvPaKv9xtJX4MuOSPAabgdgStKH/vS1buzIPAmzzSeAEm0P25M3DPD0yWagMJ
	KCUqcX7zoBmhGGDQ/1orkI9DbEjbB6VnkgvXdpkMw1P2T0A4Ehn8m1ipJjH7wd1k39
	vIMAZI/mqvmMXnqfNhv6GT1am3JTPcyVd9uAfAoBpojG2uT9QYWwtaykIVWsAn4Vqv
	5OFGeFvBM8hp8hVCXDooE2CWDkAs2IZPRJdL+YXqkVMREvO6/i1QTr34fCpAZL1HOC
	M6/fQbrGoV48Q==
X-Nifty-SrcIP:	[119.150.36.16]
Date:	Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:09:30 +0900
From:	Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Too many level of symbolic links (still have problem with sbmfs
	network drives)
Message-Id:	<20220311180930.e0ca6a9bf1b9f0f5c7f9fb5e@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To:	<20220309095840.2a1d82b207922c9a4c8badab@nifty.ne.jp>
References:	<21ce8733-b5b9-4f04-516a-c674b3cf1162 AT polymtl DOT ca>
	<20220305112326 DOT 8d07e89f03eb382f58023055 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<20220308001455 DOT 9da9b8e10b76e9350c22520a AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<03fc13d6-55c0-3fd3-87c0-857d026a1d1a AT polymtl DOT ca>
	<20220309085213 DOT 6e6a2cf2bf842eb51e9dd0d5 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
	<4bf8ea5a-4afb-e3ee-e177-5dc3053340a4 AT polymtl DOT ca>
	<20220309095840 DOT 2a1d82b207922c9a4c8badab AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Cc:	Philippe Debanne <p DOT debanne AT polymtl DOT ca>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:58:40 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:16:29 -0500
> Philippe Debanne wrote:
> > Yes OK, you can send me the DLL, I will test it in the next couple of days.
> 
> Thanks for your cooperation. I have just sent you cygwin1.dll
> for the test. Please test it and let me know the resulted
> debug messages.

I received the debug messages and understood what is happening.
I added a workaround for this issue, so could you please test
the cygwin1.dll with the workaround patch, and let me know the
test result?

I will send you the patched cygwin1.dll shortly.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -