delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2022/02/27/06:54:56

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 099783858D37
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
header.from=bernhard-voelker.de
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bernhard-voelker.de
Message-ID: <f5455ae6-a91c-b948-1c21-133cec1816f8@bernhard-voelker.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 12:54:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.6.0
Subject: Re: Patches to findutils 4.9.0-1's updatedb to do locking, allow
filenames with spaces & progress monitoring, exclude /dev on Cygwin, etc.
To: Dan Harkless <cygwin-list21 AT harkless DOT org>, bug-findutils AT gnu DOT org,
cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <986736274 DOT 144968 DOT 1630167325057 DOT ref AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
<986736274 DOT 144968 DOT 1630167325057 AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
<a60ffa68-274a-5072-c90a-0dce7bc93431 AT harkless DOT org>
<3457cee1-18b5-2916-adee-afdfaf9769ea AT t-online DOT de>
<525a832a-78fd-5a32-e195-5747120da922 AT harkless DOT org>
<a3772125-f8a0-05fb-2dc5-c3a650fed7c8 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
<88b29ca4-313f-2318-c2ed-b55f86aafac0 AT harkless DOT org>
From: Bernhard Voelker <mail AT bernhard-voelker DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <88b29ca4-313f-2318-c2ed-b55f86aafac0@harkless.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cNoG0t/z97mBC+vAqg85IidosZqyOLl5Gtq5qOwVvfiGNMTMME6
vGS96e0KHLi0rBymbYKtSt7q5xxeDd1UkDJGDT3MxmbUhuCTzcTTPHrKAIQiEhGF7z6Ayje
le2J/br11RnCHBKSWF7MFb035lCbuUrHcgb3DR0UbUjEYXChL8uRVmYds1LF/Z1JLk5v4d+
RZXKEGBQzoZ+9eGgAm/+g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:HL5AaYXO9DE=:QIVJfGs+NT7QjApLx2amw8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X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,
SPF_NONE, TXREP,
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On 2/24/22 17:32, Dan Harkless wrote:
> I'm finally getting around to sending in a patch (to bug-findutils and 
> the Cygwin list, to which I'm currently subscribed) to address these 
> issues, along with some others, a few of which represent small changes 
> in behavior:

Thanks for the patch ... but:

a) The patch does not cleanly apply:

  ~/findutils/locate> patch -t < /tmp/updatedb.patch
  patching file updatedb
  Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assuming -R.
  Hunk #2 succeeded at 47 with fuzz 2.
  Hunk #7 FAILED at 167.
  Hunk #8 FAILED at 202.
  Hunk #9 succeeded at 217 (offset -2 lines).
  Hunk #10 succeeded at 276 (offset -2 lines).
  2 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file updatedb.rej

b) The patch changes the file 'updatedb' which is created at build time
instead of the file 'updatedb.sh' which is under version control.

c) The description says that there are 10 more or less non-trivial
changes in it.  A squashed diff of 500 lines on a file with 342 lines
makes reviewing and discussing of each topic impossible.

Would you mind re-sending as separate Git patches?

Have a nice day,
Berny

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019