delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
DMARC-Filter: | OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 243BA385840C |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) |
header.from=develop-help.com | |
Authentication-Results: | sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=develop-help.com |
Date: | Tue, 23 Nov 2021 10:23:02 +1100 |
From: | Tony Cook <tony AT develop-help DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: possible snprintf() regression in 3.3.2 |
Message-ID: | <20211122232302.GI10332@venus.tony.develop-help.com> |
References: | <YZT1S8wDnaBuYf5u AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> |
<20211118000649 DOT GG10332 AT venus DOT tony DOT develop-help DOT com> | |
<20211118203538 DOT a049809d57731fe375801c15 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> | |
<YZZSzPhbqF6cQAiu AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> | |
<fa647f83-c5ed-6dea-fcba-c8b799abe12f AT gmail DOT com> | |
<YZZi3rI5msk6ksAV AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> | |
<7545bb24-43de-cd7d-0764-55c85f1af957 AT gmx DOT com> | |
<20211121001613 DOT GH10332 AT venus DOT tony DOT develop-help DOT com> | |
<YZtyJDXdrMzVR2lJ AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> | |
<YZuVRjYoG40cEGDV AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <YZuVRjYoG40cEGDV@calimero.vinschen.de> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, |
KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, SPF_HELO_NONE, | |
SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 | |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on |
server2.sourceware.org | |
X-BeenThere: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Mailman-Version: | 2.1.29 |
List-Id: | General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe> | |
List-Archive: | <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help> |
List-Subscribe: | <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>, |
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe> | |
Errors-To: | cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com |
Sender: | "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 02:04:06PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Nov 22 11:34, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > > On Nov 21 11:16, Tony Cook wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 09:08:40PM +0000, Sam Edge via Cygwin wrote: > > > > I use newlib on embedded with threading libs that have predetermined > > > > fixed thread stack sizes. While we tend to have more RAM than in former > > > > times we also have multiple thread stacks. Use of alloca() or variable > > > > length automatic arrays makes me wince especially in code I might not be > > > > able to avoid calling which is often the case with XXXprintf() in > > > > third-party libraries' debug output. I'd usually rather take the > > > > performance hit from using heap instead of having to make all my stacks > > > > bigger. > > > > > > A simple option would be to use an small auto fixed buffer for most > > > conversions, but use malloc() for %f formats for numbers greater in > > > magnitude than some limit, though it would also need to be adjusted > > > for the precision (ndigits here), since they take extra space. > > > > > > This would avoid using the optional-to-implement VLA feature too. > > > > Good idea. I guess I create a simple fix doing just that. > > I created a patch: > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commitdiff;h=68faeef4be71 > > Please test the latest developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ I don't think this solves the fundamental problem. Simply looking at ndigits isn't enough for %f. For %f with a large number (like 9e99), the buffer size required is ndigits plus (roughly) log10(n), which we can further estimate with log2(n)*146/485 (log2(10) is 3.32 ~== 485/146) I think something more like: size_t outsize; if (mode == 3) { /* %f */ int expon = (e[NI-1] & 0x7fff) - (EXONE - 1); /* exponent part of float */ /* log2(10) approximately 485/146 */ outsize = expon * 146 / 485 + ndigits + 10; } else { /* %g/%e */ outsize = ndigits + MAX_EXP_DIGITS + 10; } if (outsize > NDEC_SML) { outbuf = (char *)_malloc_r(ptr, outsize); } You'll probably need to pass outsize into etoasc() rather than calculating it. See https://github.com/Perl/perl5/blob/blead/sv.c#L13295 for code in perl that calculates the buffer size needed for %f (precis aka ndigits is added at line 13385). Tony -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |