X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5208F3858022
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1637576789;
	bh=SHb45grlXHWixpGCyhmNtAb5g907vDoqcWp2bYTjQu0=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=idML2Z1AsFDkwDUz+VRBKqnfwbFZaiP0svb2pNQEGjOfwj7Dcc6VVWpNUeSWc0Pa/
	lm6I6PEpVUtXlXDMrFYcYUSNYXADbCcrCM9lL6TrSdeYn0rak/BZ4sHVeJQTXVCGsM
	bWt0q8lwYLRrAIOBbQ7rbPqbuEKvFv4fhQeegOMQ=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 62D7B3858D35
Date:	Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:25:53 +0100
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: raise(-1) has stopped returning an error recently
Message-ID:	<YZtwMZ1LUbx+b5+s@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<YZsoj6UvpF6pcbtt AT slk1 DOT local DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<YZsoj6UvpF6pcbtt@slk1.local.net>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:eap/zcU61n6aG2CTsqXydGW/3UHwQiC2Jtq5t2DWjPtMpV1uleT
	XwNrzsxyslvU5X7MlFtKdEzLecMuT8RfOL6OgOU2AS7Ey64J9/n+4XxAyeEsbBqgKs8rU4U
	ng9IQ/Tg4EkZFwyMIvnUZzkPKkNYBMcdI41XEQEy/N40C0BCuCRbgDbcwja+TIz4XMnRbkG
	+KX/jsBLBf5Ov+oNSTaSw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V03:K0:DLRr3TqrRa0=:BRx1fbkTD1I8HEYMjgxCrh
	HYjILtLBqpe3NVJO96fUjc/7f6+Rs6tGO2I+9lvPH/TrL7itqKh/qnIG3ygHgX0Fn9JZupXFq
	WKIIv6diA0nc9+qBqu/uUYvNQTvLfMMOS3irOf1v3LsMqMFIoSOKRgmiwoaaeL3jWnLS13cRv
	HlBfHLiXoFjQZj7M5RM5md3OpNZ5mJ0TYTxlHH2FuAOEfcKjERNenk89vvbrus8RxB+pHZb2p
	4LPI5fFuQVJS4+XKkuxMZw7M/23LEphwWkbiJUxV+sFUH1bTt7B+z+e4pr41PzC42k50/tAMh
	pJD/OjaICAHOJ+lsM9iVIbKt3tyr/DUSV5pT8jX+HLx5FABpr1NjNN/cJeLqzNU0/PziH3uVC
	SfuAAk0vAGvyCbzKFMRAj99YmxmQgpyMPPZmdrIlsGBbRI0P8RVPrVPN/81ls3ul/852ssS5M
	IxaGKjZXqx3R0aZXbor3TzbYu7tzazNZFI+H0Ev4s6Az1ztmZYvbJeVBxqusERF0ILCw/jxNz
	e7RN/qckcsrXt+1Kcl1p/R7zRjuvPw9NRRfa94I2jdBDpjkmlNGKi1nsn7okDQJq3Qbr+Pb6O
	8gjpId/Qs/qpVW5obgegvDvc5UNO7dJuV3BHP0kE7isTln3kEK+MUq7jqjTQ50LUx4DmdaBix
	6zkUk0knfcX1a27169coJ1MXtPxyNpyQT2aswIFSxmbYn2Uqkrs88djOePrfnAxD/AF449J1b
	1dIUGD0u6KFKlj7m/lSmC4vvSHYlL/n6QqzzP1YVFDRTNdLQ0FSSVpu738UPWm5Nkf/NMTvGR
	5DH3EieVl0NTxsYeNeA6YrMAXN8e9rC7tQLeE3cSzpE/bqpJZEz7aWuFmBRMZQ+KnI7qLEKJ8
	7vMzUxMH0bsLUz/VRNgF0mq58GPUe3O38I3GuC6hzo32JLnemPX8Ivf1e+04mC6rhAdWVdKhh
	P4F7QlTEb7QyttPb/80xv4nH1X++3U73xL3NucfeTMwkrT9SthnBAfbBfy1b97IZ0MFAEX1By
	/4FQK10BYij6O6H4KhnIoLXpkgX7v8W4xHJR1QmX8/Yc7xXYFTqVV/kpGq0WNV0oMYFWfiXRx
	x012XUXmGTyu1U=
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-99.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NEUTRAL,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Nov 22 16:20, Duncan Roe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I stumbled across this when running 'make check' in the grep source directory.
> 
> test-raise failed when it didn't a few weeks ago.

Pretty unlikely.  This code didn;'t change for ages.  I just checked
against Cygwin 3.2.0 and it also returns success.

> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <signal.h>
> 
> int
> main (void)
> {
>   int retcod;
> 
>   retcod = raise (-1);
>   printf("raise(-1) returned %d\n", retcod);
> }

Thanks for the STC.  There are actually two long-standing problems,
one in raise, calling pthread_kill even for non-threaded processes,
one in pthread_kill, not checking the signal number.

I'll patch them right away.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -