X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6D86A3858018
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1635366999;
	bh=Gxw//jlCxTIZkiiSLAP1GBgFAzrcs3gaLaBcSlfV3Zw=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:
	List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:From;
	b=ozgpbaX/hIqGNLX3QvFCK8tkCnzujpiVq83xblq4yJYTeekGyf+eS3NL9zEYlDmZf
	+0hQvw977irzwk/vlFn7RfVs2WKJi0RMD10MHEuhdlFLV5aBaHHEKuRwGpcF7BwgwK
	v8GtGSXn04YiJN38CrZY6/5qXDDBI1M7dmAYuA+Y=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 52F2A3858402
Date:	Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-X-Sender:	jeremyd AT resin DOT csoft DOT net
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support
Message-ID:	<alpine.BSO.2.21.2110271335110.96033@resin.csoft.net>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.21 (BSO 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_PASS,
	SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Jeremy Drake via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Jeremy Drake <cygwin AT jdrake DOT com>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

Oops, forgot to send to list.

On Wed, 27 Oct 2021, Takashi Yano wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 22:55:01 +0200
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > We're also planning to drop Support for the 32 bit release of Cygwin in
> > 2022, thus Cygwin 3.4.0 won't come in 32 bit anymore, and the package
> > maintainers won't have to update 32 bit packages anymore.  If you're
> > still running Cygwin under WOW64, consider to move to 64 bit in the next
> > couple of months.
>
> I agree with you that 32 bit cygwin under WOW64 is not worth to
> support any more. However, 32 bit version of Windows 10 will be
> still supported at least until Oct. 2025. Personally, I think it
> would not be nice to exclude the supported windows version from
> cygwin support.

Please also note that Windows on ARM64 only just got the ability to run
x86_64 binaries in Windows 11.  Previously the only option was 32-bit
x86, as there is no native ARM port of Cygwin.  I don't know about Cygwin
directly, but I know there are users of Git for Windows on ARM.

I think a more gradual sunsetting of 32-bit might be a resonable
compromise, based on the original wording:

> 11:26 <corinna> starting with 3.4.0, maintainers are not obliged to
> release packages in 32 bit

so as of 3.4.0 some packages that are problematic on 32 bit may stop
providing 32-bit versions.  But not being obliged to release packages is a
whole different thing than having the core code that allows *any* package
to run being ripped out in that version.

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -