X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D482A3971C08
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1629208543;
	bh=DM2EFwICmbb+vfKxYvkRpbRC7vZDDhvJWve3Ne1j9yY=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=c75fXLjVGuwzbHvbR8fafe9rnjZRJhX9kNEXxo2efEeiIwSFubjy0HxCKHhfLJjMm
	nlsJNLjt/KUyIVwhazp+ZTFtOIu4xRK3nhC3phEl3l9S4iiMJ9SLMkPHjeZzSs7iwr
	toUdWhgLNUwXacZMlneiNUSGmsZvaflpB80ifWj4=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D7663389ECAA
Date:	Tue, 17 Aug 2021 15:51:54 +0200
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Duplicates in /proc/partitions
Message-ID:	<YRu++uklGOPynvdf@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<CAPJ9Yc8KMkmkCsZH7HwzHD59ju41L0svOcCskd3e0OG4qJ8Gxw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<YRp7abUpIAqLCod3 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<9a770c83-62ef-6849-16e7-e6956f4d2fab AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
	<YRqzOZAiDEfkHBM+@calimero.vinschen.de>
	<DM8PR09MB70958FD69B70B19E187BD682A5FE9 AT DM8PR09MB7095 DOT namprd09 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<DM8PR09MB70958FD69B70B19E187BD682A5FE9@DM8PR09MB7095.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K1:DhSGUgZzzTRFCO488ulRPAej4Vd3Dy5PJUIOf1M+HM+bvLvoNvi
	PH1VXXE9V8gtfUCOVnLcjHHYjeDyUHCOw2f5JRhZb5ZW421S9n9CIqsMrlcvPJ56N3XsYfI
	zkhAyl4pxYwgIEj1SirxzCo6OtNcqnO+XkcLsd3ih6rwkUu9LgW1BCKBvHW7wvCuhfEe6eE
	l64cH7yz2Z6LrYv5FfNSQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V03:K0:ioXC3g/jLvo=:jhPGEhVFkmECNbJI2cBtlk
	+8JPxEofRvGG3yfeor75YV1QY9JGSjgKrp/YfGVRGX7Lcc+xHPP0tlvE6GHb4e0vNXMtOcGs2
	Jg04M0D5ySrlT2t3hk0eP7BIm0W6uGDBXQYtY9aJmdS8139u7MkLPdfnBMhmHt1PAHMMQvTDN
	CHAk8BckJ5u0LaWBGSBVZYVcvbV3HSbNa/DzjzR1A1e0vRG8prXtbBXw97mC38kIZA53x4vXh
	caXfSo8v+aWCdb00h88vtzllXFwcIILJeUcBu2MypKJlTj1aSIAIan1oYL3u21AtOWG1x3c7/
	SQ15pInYCsiaD30i66ZZhN+xwZMaPWqNUETAMo4q9fug7PPLALiVMdjz0/YhICkctRfvOQ51g
	kLMFshJx7RGRHFSf+/yBr5n4VyV9U/UYFIW36ZUVSHf+0MFC/sYYMGEGvxp5WBlXVtnotFcyY
	upS2eCM2yJM7hPKgPypTXkrJcukbpSydHTV4ZZBldnV6BxlTi4tSfuQh4A7wfvlW647C2WWvg
	NqBcuHszALFgNBqNhLHqHYQeV083Ljjj9LdzUFEuZsok35rmWyc8XXEql+tQLuNrS5TWU409S
	0j4yczcoECtzQewZFfSFrR5PwJFyJKD6p/h/ouLbeo3lnlPA1p7Hsp2job7261NovuqqI8+8P
	Mb9HhgZEp6Pgz+jyFqecmEgPRfhpbM8GbffHFCwxKqOHXlZv7IV/QZrmwO2nhEi7DpMAYZFAq
	/6ussjQiNjS3OtE4sweogX/LCdb3zE+n9gOElw4UzADdtxkXhtzePPDXoxiFyjYXXG7Ncou8I
	zEfomfC2+S0nUJWWjviwMPxHQO+EMHIa/pUn8l9aXlHNo+TrAA8cwe1wN/IFGrZnYWiINucsh
	N2saOQDH9zAiDYEQ4XpQ==
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-99.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,
	SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NEUTRAL,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Errors-To:	cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Aug 17 12:57, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin wrote:
> > $ gcc -g -O2 -o proc_partition_O2 proc_partition.c -lntdll
> 
> I ran the program (without gdb yet, can't doit right away)... Its
> output is a bit different from /proc/partitions (w.r.t. drive names),

Yes, it's just faked in the most dirt-simple way.  I added a comment to
the code to outline why that is.

> but I still see the duplicates:

Great!  That means it should be pretty straightforward to see why the
problem occurs by stepping through the code.  For a start I'd suggest
to set a breakpoint to line 103, that's the first DeviceIoControl call.
That line is only reached for actual disks when looping over the
native \Device directory.

On second thought, I have a vague idea...  Could you please just add
something to the output, i.e, change lines 124/125 from

    printf ("%5d %5d %9llu sd%c\n",
            8, (dev_name - 'a') * 16, size >> 10, dev_name);

to

    printf ("%5d %5d %9llu sd%c (%lu)\n",
            8, (dev_name - 'a') * 16, size >> 10, dev_name,
            (unsigned long) context);

and just compile and run the testcase again?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -