X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter:	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 30AC53950CA5
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1626869984;
	bh=DWWPzHEQZ3tiavCTrNqzT7yvCy6mnPeuyyiYeqvBaw4=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	From;
	b=qzaifWtoT/5s1EreUknf96N5hnPDXfG6dRqhJUuEuBv944Un8k5zqixFnFjdIXjvl
	riN89cqAIWV8F/odJ/eHAtW4u6cbT0vO9G4CQI+xNWq6Hk/KBJoKcHY79s9t7NB+5u
	tcZE+5PNv/gY5hR5dmQ493j6QBkN1EInSUDPYnuA=
X-Original-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter:	OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6E7303851C37
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=NF+NszRX/t0ld/F4cKvf7YQ2qQ8nJcfNm6FdltiRqSQ=;
	b=JacBsZSpvoeKcYlVPtq828wrSQiFB2qmvIaSONTHgp8mR+4SKCeJjVRUKmaVHN63qO
	uTYNXoXEuuIcZCg5oAV/RrAkQIjmS08m+ep7Arp91m48VW6pXoq2XBngm3d87RZDWzlC
	DqeNvBOLvnCVBKB8SZHZoOnVkvnc3RTTrxniXBm/RrZurXxNyNtum/uZyzmbZNjn9YHK
	8r/2kw+yj6pbB40+gIitCd/85fEFWFydtktiHNa6AoENan30UfVQKqKTp1Mwg2UtksvM
	VPrSM85d1TbIlNSDCG21oACwyxjqGCiN7hTsFxnWM6QRzQDAhqyvtmerm9LqwKrWoHCE
	VMAg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOAM532OpO9yR9DkVTUpldOgzKabfCD1TRhfFdPI3zY4kdHuHuWZJqQ2
	bPDhxnPlW3GmHnBeQQyRFv/dKWYa7UuA6i6+A2k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ABdhPJx6hL1p+LN200+VN0vRAu1GsluM09Xu1W428boXbVFWOVbeQE4WIRsVlzdgf7P3oFo1pusAovRM7cplosiLI9w=
X-Received:	by 2002:a05:6820:1057:: with SMTP id
	x23mr24330456oot.56.1626869951763;
	Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<CAK5_-8oS-CNCFqL6bqn3YgdnDF4ALq6tn3Z5_AzBEH-P3ai1yQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAK5_-8oS-CNCFqL6bqn3YgdnDF4ALq6tn3Z5_AzBEH-P3ai1yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Jul 2021 05:18:56 -0700
Message-ID:	<CANV2+nWOVGzC=Nxmmc+xd43AH17XCQ2U2=8rC2uNKSjLT8V+nA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: Incorrect expansion of a program argument that is a special
	character?
To:	Ev Drikos <drikosev AT gmail DOT com>
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
	TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
	server2.sourceware.org
X-Content-Filtered-By:	Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version:	2.1.29
List-Id:	General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive:	<https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:	<https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
	<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From:	Russell VT via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	Russell VT <russellvt AT gmail DOT com>
Cc:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sender:	"Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

Note that Powershell and BASH wildcard (globbing) may be notably different,
which includes how items may be "escaped" to prevent such globbing
operations.

Moreover, in a UN*X shell, it is generally thought that it's the user's
responsibility to declare how how file expansion should work, generally
defaulting to the "one or more" presence (where true regular expressions
use an asterisk as "zero or more"). In this way, shells and general regular
expressions may differ.

TLDR; In any environment, "arguments" are different between the command
line, and the program itself.

Basically, you need to understand how any given shell will pass arguments
to your program, and that exercise is generally outside of general
executable-type discussion (ie. it is almost a "religious war" as to how
various shells may process arguments, regular expressions, or wildcards ...
along with what options a user may specify to change the behaviour)

Do you have an example of where the program functions as-expected, along
with examples as to how the identical binary functions differently in
other environments?

Hope that lights a few lightbulbs for ya!

Russell VT


On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 4:44 AM Ev Drikos via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> When I run the program below from my home directory in a PowerShell
> Console (Windows 8-1) I've to use an extra backslash character as
> shown below or the star is expanded. Which happens only when the
> program has been compiled in Cygwin.
>
> Is this a bug or a known feature?
>
> Ev. Drikos
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> PS C:\Users\suser> .\args.exe '\*'
>
> *
> argc=1
> PS C:\Users\suser>
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
> int i;
> for (i=1; i < argc; i++) {
>   printf("\n%s",argv[i]);
> }//for
>  printf("\nargc=%d\n",argc-1);
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>


-- 
Russell M. Van Tassell <russellvt AT gmail DOT com>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -